[tsvwg] 2nd WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts - Concluded

"Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com> Thu, 16 May 2019 17:18 UTC

Return-Path: <David.Black@dell.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A4A12008F for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 10:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.709
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.709 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dell.com header.b=gCYLxvh1; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=emc.com header.b=duPxUi/J
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R0sMUOtpoFHV for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2019 10:18:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00154904.pphosted.com (mx0b-00154904.pphosted.com [148.163.137.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCFE6120043 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 10:18:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0170398.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00154904.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4GH9uJ0029564 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:18:48 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dell.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=smtpout1; bh=96sOrVVnLwLufMnNc6fhbdheEB7ebS/OK/DWGikOXII=; b=gCYLxvh1DSWpYVWEdZgD9gb9nL4RY0nF49Cyq9IkkwZpqPP2yp+EULvJJ1XGs+NVyybD vW0bcPrLjy1h4T/N9MH28+nE71VIinULg3dz2DyuhVgrycrpBb3RFIXPyahOqsayhWA/ 95p9+zncoG1YG+mTJRM3LJ/Za6Bqzr74jjGG5Tzvj0sW5jMBv5aJ66iYHRlEw84yvPGg s7YfHXb8CE1zJIKBDj+j2kMADw3wzoo3b+/SDTMhyfn7UDmmOayGM660vg/+zED2vPxV MY+6N4uwpyvP/xHbK0NxkYIWYNQmQYNKmCbsFPo3RT6xIClc+RgKEy4Xcjn5+igrov0M NQ==
Received: from mx0a-00154901.pphosted.com (mx0a-00154901.pphosted.com [67.231.149.39]) by mx0b-00154904.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2sgr4ubt8d-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:18:48 -0400
Received: from pps.filterd (m0134746.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00154901.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x4GHD07s040996 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:18:47 -0400
Received: from mailuogwdur.emc.com (mailuogwdur.emc.com [128.221.224.79]) by mx0a-00154901.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2sh9apkhcy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:18:47 -0400
Received: from maildlpprd56.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd56.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.160]) by mailuogwprd54.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id x4GHIj2o011883 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:18:45 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd54.lss.emc.com x4GHIj2o011883
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1558027126; bh=MN2cCXnTIiaY/JplV4rU7zpTWbw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=duPxUi/JuhQiUiLq1CPYw3xYU0qfymFwSentSm8FBiC3EUwtkqsQNMv9ch6Wu9LR8 gKsRzhehj94UnKvHE9uqfwH0DpTtDjF/8Hz5dFa2soT/YwG796O3SEhSMpjS1cMjTl 0HzzTVnRJSoncJS1wkuLJ4hyZxR95pvlZfKwAk3E=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd54.lss.emc.com x4GHIj2o011883
Received: from mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.21]) by maildlpprd56.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:18:33 -0400
Received: from MXHUB313.corp.emc.com (MXHUB313.corp.emc.com [10.146.3.91]) by mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id x4GHHhe3030897 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:18:34 -0400
Received: from MX307CL04.corp.emc.com ([fe80::849f:5da2:11b:4385]) by MXHUB313.corp.emc.com ([10.146.3.91]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 16 May 2019 13:18:22 -0400
From: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: 2nd WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts - Concluded
Thread-Index: AdUMC1xbtNHynAkRQMKgzY9qqMQbaw==
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 17:18:21 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363056B221@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.238.21.130]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363056B221MX307CL04corpem_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd03.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-05-16_14:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=401 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905160109
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=461 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905160109
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/9RZ7CRIov6XyMIDtKO8ze_CWIo0>
Subject: [tsvwg] 2nd WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts - Concluded
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 17:18:55 -0000

The 2nd WGLC on these drafts has concluded, and we did get enough reviews this time, so there should be no need for a 3rd WGLC.

Many thanks to those who took the time to review and comment.  Bob (primary author) is working on addressing the comments.

Thanks, --David

From: tsvwg <tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Black, David
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:51 PM
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: [tsvwg] 2nd WGLC on ecn-encap-guidelines and rfc6040-update-shim drafts, closes 6 May 2019


[EXTERNAL EMAIL]

This email announces a 2nd TSVWG Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on two drafts:



[1] Guidelines for Adding Congestion Notification to Protocols that

                             Encapsulate IP

                draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines-12

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-encap-guidelines/

This draft is intended to become a Best Current Practice RFC



[2] Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification Across IP Tunnel Headers

                          Separated by a Shim

                 draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim-08

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim/

This draft is intended to become a Proposed Standard RFC.



This WGLC will run through the end of the day on Monday, May 6, 2019.



Comments should be sent to the tsvwg@ietf.org<mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org> list, although purely

editorial comments may be sent directly to the author. Please cc: the

WG chairs at tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>  if you would like the chairs to

track such editorial comments as part of the WGLC process.



No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on either draft



Thanks,

David, Gorry and Wes

(TSVWG Co-Chairs)