Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 09 July 2013 07:51 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BABA21F9F4C for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AfVbU79mW8Rb for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40F421F9F42 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2013 00:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.254.103] ([80.92.116.131]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MQQzk-1UmXaJ1oJI-00TkRA; Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:51:00 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <32AE7F11-A06E-40C1-A73C-5C69F252DAF9@iii.ca>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:50:55 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A1FB1EED-30AE-40F6-B10F-EAD79406C671@gmx.net>
References: <32AE7F11-A06E-40C1-A73C-5C69F252DAF9@iii.ca>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.4.1
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vyJYbOKskVV/MD3gDVsG/X+ofY7SEJN+4X70nQubLK+VkDEuf6d HDcLwvPpx4H+nHEByB2WeHWVWEC0quCqpkrd8fbbFmZtqBWsaQcp6TWarIi7bX/CcSZKsHB jghVSt0N6FJ87RtxrhQuBD9lKpme8T/5e7PO1yyTARPRIGoZE8g8kpFD9wylDWmrq9qnkNv GbS6CUaYHOMUYrGXUQ+zA==
Cc: DAN DRUTA <dd5826@att.com>, tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 07:51:16 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi Cullen, this document is still an individual draft and so I am not sure what you mean by working group last call. - From a content point of view I am not sure how useful it is. I shared my views about how this applies to LTE; IMHO it is not applicable. It would be so great if we could solve all QoS challenges by defining yet another set of DiffServ code points. Ciao Hannes On Jul 9, 2013, at 2:35 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote: > > The draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos draft was discussed extensively when it was an individual draft then WG draft in another WG and I don't think there is much more to say about it. This is one of the normative dependencies of the webrtc work and that stuff is already getting implemented in browsers so I want to move this along in an expedient fashion. > > I think it is ready for WGLC. If there are any issues people think need to be discussed before WGLC, please let us know so we can resolve them in Berlin. > > Thanks, Cullen > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJR28DgAAoJEGhJURNOOiAtwEgH/RyutI92AUxypRQxBkUT/kUW 3JBjPOCEZyrIcShqlwLtesmOhrgbxbkoo8ltHSwEoQdPAWo+krmJBaG+5Z/ypCwB PHz7zmepxChbQUF/giBp/9Sa37PlV7F0TSG3Bp9cFrXAYqCBhuyD34veosIAUE69 HZu9yFwmEreLCIeggdcUyD1Loy+pZd1Sqs5wicFu+7oV8M+ejb2D4x3GozhgV2RJ dVxtl0dvJ1lPwNluCSXr57ZtUAHHuFDQ28qujt6cCQyVytRT2HkS3DgRX58ownGg 3d8W6Dw7bbkU3WN0+oyOnthGdiYP2Kr2hSbEKWSGXCn9bYiNDiwWEdzjvsUsUxs= =S45+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Cullen Jennings
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Dave Taht
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Cullen Jennings
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Andrew McGregor
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Subha Dhesikan (sdhesika)
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Subha Dhesikan (sdhesika)
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Andrew Mcgregor
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Subha Dhesikan (sdhesika)
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Subha Dhesikan (sdhesika)
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Andrew Mcgregor
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-dhesikan-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos Brian E Carpenter