Re: [tsvwg] Interim meeting agenda for TSVWG April Interim Meetings

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 09 April 2020 00:54 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE33B3A1B80 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 17:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1nUV8azsD2aI for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 17:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 290443A1B7F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 17:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id n17so9654794lji.8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 17:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LDv6/UaTovOpsAtWFqxKsG9UUmilb4cI1xgMIHEXXQ0=; b=DKiKN4zig5dS5/OxTUROU1sbL4LJLWZX6TzxDT9YnUYhzKRUf80Qgj59/FeEbxSR73 O1QwV7swTDSXuLII92dZGaiVp9EuELmNMF2e/0sKFbHgmox5Zyaqh32wukt7rFJzKMl5 UviGF1BXysW+MgVfSEHVCz7qtDFOA1CEIJJE8bZF0iwjXSXA7n6aKSnZKZ6294QcZs5+ AiyJZl1WE/XclmWRu+br9f7Oj9ApECvU4SrHoMYunKqGORpL/rR1xMUreNXz4rKcGRMx RGfe0vCeHN0InALbcOJoJTIdUOinFbHo5jULxUdOlAKLdg1AZV8RUmWlGbla4eJytgUj f8Cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LDv6/UaTovOpsAtWFqxKsG9UUmilb4cI1xgMIHEXXQ0=; b=NyxyZmyYNmQcZJBAntjSZFVuugCCLlpGmsyd80R6f4f1h0iBDcQ26y8bUSpj1hagHy DZw+nygzW2gKxbTM+DIonl7Syb0gftkpHmXgJZsNLUrP4ocRnVFy659MxKlQ5xuCaqjf GddKf3tqU/ozPJluO6GD72/mW7w9tMJ1vZl4U8fAcmTjyezk6dc5MPTzyIQZMp+Zmxu7 7YMllkpPTq5Ux1dBeA8ZxZOaXu5hGQFHHvpn/Dsb0JwS8BVa/FNacsFLp9RUu8f3z/Ir DYPFhPxdZVJWVzSSnme7wtW1WDX9aNxA9BElozkwanq/x8v9xz0K36wRS31iroYekCZ8 Qt2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZvPncTyMkzIFn/gBytGFjornsacIaQivj2lKic3SyZkG1vZBGX 6uUXxit/3I2zTojKY7d25lVqFmS/ey1TIvxKDY0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIYrXGJUZZbBzweEOc+OV5+M7XhOVF0FPfHpSXFRREtoJRSG6w5t3VVZ8KIN/8er+M81+HNG4u217NNo5DVcxc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b4cc:: with SMTP id r12mr6571893ljm.50.1586393671801; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 17:54:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKKJt-etYiZes-qRJCHUGwOaKq4KTXQQo0p-++WRy+bytT_wDQ@mail.gmail.com> <202004082336.038NaaBV002631@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <202004082336.038NaaBV002631@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 19:54:05 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-eoE9511eSR1mjDh2gyaacSnON5bBEPJGXOG1umLTdc1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000481e8b05a2d10f02"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/A19QaXas7e2OCO89LxQr_K6RpXg>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Interim meeting agenda for TSVWG April Interim Meetings
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 00:54:36 -0000

Hi, Rodney,

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 6:36 PM Rodney W. Grimes <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
wrote:

> > I didn't say this at the mike, so it won't be in the minutes, but ...
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:12 AM Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
> wrote:
> >
> > > TSVWG,
> > >
> > > Here is the (shortened) agenda for the on-line interim meetings, based
> > > on the Agenda submitted for the Vancouver IETF. If you are scheduled to
> > > present in Interim 1 (WG document status), please send slides for us to
> > > upload to the meeting materials page. We will shortly distribute
> > > information for Interim 2.
> > >
> > > Best wishes,
> > >
> > > Gorry
> > >
> > > (TSVWG Co-Chairs)
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Wednesday Apr-08-2020 1000
> > > 0700-0930 UTC-7 (San Francisco) = 1000-1230 UTC-4 (Boston) = 1500-1730
> > > UTC+1 (London) = 1600-1830 UTC+2 (Berlin) = 2200-0030[+1] UTC+8
> (Beijing
> > > - not on summer time, other 4 are)
> > >
> > > TSWG Interim #1
> > >
> >
> > (deleted down to)
> >
> >          6.2   Jerome Henry: QCI and Diffserv API (10 mins)
> > >          draft-henry-tsvwg-diffserv-to-qci
> > >
> >
> > The other reason I hope TSVWG pushes a bit more in this space is that the
> > final answer may be either "you guys should really be using diffserv" or
> > "you guys are working on new 5G markers and you can't map the ones you
> > already have onto diffserv now, so good luck" ... and I could live with
> > either answer, if it was written down.
> >
> > No snark intended.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Spencer
>
> A strong +1, I do understand that the carriers have a far more
> robust set of traffic types to deal with, but I would think
> some order of alignment in the space should be attempted.
>
> Infact given that the carriers are also carriers of internet
> traffic I would of thought that some mapping was already in
> place.
>

^^^^ THIS. I hadn't ever asked myself that question, but that might be a
good question for us to keep in mind.

What DO they do now?

Best,

Spencer