[tsvwg] Fwd: Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-02-20

Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Wed, 05 February 2020 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A44C120059 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:28:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j1qYB6yG8Rxq for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:28:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8BC91200B6 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id c5so1665237qtj.6 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:28:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=4D27E/Y0C41PgXqIOWokDz/9SFIaAUR8CkiE7o55I/g=; b=FlV8z4VK4uoBz9UdIFDJBS/WIE+QRoYBY7WJDUWkjcvCqLNFpkEAQvHzUjgJ/Dm1Xd 6h210jn2l40m0yhAlwlNtW+t9GpwXrtbk1yjjQcRXu5K8aaIrAzCn5OkLw0THVIOOjkw fZ13Ui7uz3wuHJ+CCiqX7898IhGEpVSOn2CBbNUBstIFgL8zGQvwV4WyP8pOFynXt+5M SM7NDgC+R6Q60qeed1xtEvQG9JxXb3A1yuOzEqDlbAvYzRQlaJrkesRoMk/+gLq5lVT7 eAXWPEQSkHpgRRC3x589iV8ktsNy5N/0QZ1KRXJCjAThEj65WY7CyMCSt6bG/GehVn3Z MLAw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=4D27E/Y0C41PgXqIOWokDz/9SFIaAUR8CkiE7o55I/g=; b=fr6mixvLjxIJhDRl/YKcIAkDPa4deYTR3Rqubj1wShn461Hk0jtcwipCGQcRdThIwU fb1uud0ejzhfJrA3t/dz9iCgFYDLIMMqaMFwF46pTHYB1ZeiWuzAGh//VpLhdgHgKdli WpJI8NJU4ow0qLAs/EKB51xBwqdVpQLyZVJf4YjVQwQ6nQ3/C6e3jSGZTpAcpFl808OM Iw7G72355Z3/fl8pBDSHR0+kT1VPmmiKDq2Li2ApPgjQswERmxmbCTjKCuO8tRq/dWMt D0Yo8djYSiD9iK+cx1bq2sZ/Ud//rtUCB2BqFsmEWMf6FZr5BrJxBVLgJmdUOBD/4lyT FQ5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUG2B7qcwx7UYr36dEZIUwgK+zCf6EPwinmKxXFo5aerWNF7EYF myKCbiT6FvJcDQP1zlV7/7Rbofh1NQo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxUcKKc41NxUDsf7y21Ei7A3loO+76auzNTwO0SS3bcOihWRuNFUUOPpd+xVhmNcI5iiAbVJg==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:718d:: with SMTP id w13mr33563513qto.287.1580912887747; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:28:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (rrcs-69-135-1-122.central.biz.rr.com. []) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o12sm13241652qke.79.2020. for <tsvwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Feb 2020 06:28:07 -0800 (PST)
References: <158014090210.26587.12925021630999725769@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <158014090210.26587.12925021630999725769@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <88fce1c5-0922-2d46-8d38-ab63b8c5d039@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:28:06 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <158014090210.26587.12925021630999725769@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------7E4052FC812E02138A888AFE"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/AzKCa8rcmhoZ2tU7WR2H9qlNakI>
Subject: [tsvwg] Fwd: Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-02-20
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:28:11 -0000

In order to improve availability for the ADs and some others, would it 
be a large problem for anyone planning to participate if the time for 
this moves to one hour earlier?

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) WG Virtual Meeting: 
Date: 	Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:01:42 -0800
From: 	IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: 	IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: 	tsvwg@ietf.org

The Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) Working Group will hold
a virtual interim meeting on 2020-02-20 from 10:00 to 12:00 

1. Agenda bashing (chairs - 5 min)
2. Update on status and near-term plans for the set of L4S drafts (Bob? 
- 5 min)
- Chair request: Think about adding an explicit "Open Issues / Future 
Work" type of section in the architecture draft to consolidate a list of 
things still being worked in the context of TCP Prague and/or caveats 
and unknowns people should be aware of when deploying this Experimental 
3. Update on L4S & TCP Prague implementation, test, evaluation 
(Greg/Bob/Koen? - 15 min)
4. L4S Issues List Discussion (goal is to see if we can agree on what 
more needs to be done on each issue to suffice for 
Experimental/Informational RFCs):
4.1 Discuss status on (Bob - ~30 min):
#16 on classic ECN interaction
#21 CE codepoint semantics (closely related to #16)
#20 ECT(1) codepoint usage
4.2 Discuss plans forward to address (Bob - ~15 min):
#26 on admission control
#27 on terminology
#22 on deployment feasibility
#24 on evaluation & testing results
4.3 (We will try to handle the issues below by mailing list prior to the 
If needed, discuss close-out of (~15 min):
#25 on IPR
#18 on loss detection in time-units
#23 on implementation status
#19 on the single codepoint
#17 on FQ interaction 5. SCE Update (Morton/Heist/etc. - ~30 min)

Information about remote participation:
Remote participation information will be obtained at the time of 
approval. Plan to use IETF WebEx.

IETF-Announce mailing list