IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] RDMA Support by UDP FRAG Option

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Mon, 21 June 2021 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7134F3A147D for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.456
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.456 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sryc3ZxH5Kh6 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4D323A147B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:17:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=RWpCQqrKohHK7q8E9bmnWEAphAH3F4UNz4khvInm3yg=; b=ko5sB+MK+e+B54N7Rjr2v49+q0 zcpIQr3YVZjzD8WhDT5VAkCDzo4UC3rqaxGBYRsMJ5jwtXaKdiKKAHxvXudBmIKDXeSyVJB3tQUry xSN2+ZKNwxMstLAPdy9YfYA80l/oo52jps5zC9f3ZET89qWa9OBFgHGV1LYo1ZsH68NfukNaMCQcI lB2yLYkLK6hn1J9mBwIkaVHNQnm9TWZ4bukRb/YYvoxI4KHAZ7joeuD5eOORxFNzdCvCx2/5J5ySE NO1w0SZwwdUmyKzlas+jAVFME5U2Wo747fOnjMf4vyk6xV6g3UtpLaodu3yFXeLTnO+/dY9ImxM09 FAudklzQ==;
Received: from [38.64.80.138] (port=54558 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1lvOUQ-0021sY-ES; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:17:46 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-B265AB1C-8746-410E-BBEF-C1EB031F05BC"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S34uAMD4u+7=gqgWA9PL2rTUF1-zurYAZuQdOawvBnHF7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:17:41 -0700
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <9B4DF8FF-14A0-4CBE-8E35-0750C4B4E2F8@strayalpha.com>
References: <CALx6S34uAMD4u+7=gqgWA9PL2rTUF1-zurYAZuQdOawvBnHF7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18F72)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/BWPDPqPKwwE4N5ksFO1J3V-ER4c>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] RDMA Support by UDP FRAG Option
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 18:17:53 -0000


> On Jun 21, 2021, at 9:22 AM, Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> But your claim that “I’ve never seen an error” is like saying “but my [broken] watch is fine because I only look at it twice a day - at 8am each time”.
> 
> 
> I have NEVER said that, in fact have seen and FIXED many bugs in this area. You are completely misconstruing my words.

I was assuming this discussion did not need compilation-level precision. 

I should have said “never seen *this* error” (of erroneously using the IP length to infer the UDP data length rather than using the UDP length field). 

The point remains. Not seeing a bug does not mean the bug does not exist or that the code implements the spec. 

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email