Re: [tsvwg] WGLC Announcement for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-14 to confirm changes - 5th April 2013

["Becke, Martin" <[e-mail]>]

Hi, 

I am fine with this version. 
Motivation is clear and the draft works for me. 
I support this. 

Martin

> Dear Gorry,
> 
> I would like to express my support for the draft 
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp- encaps-14. It is a very useful extension to 
> make use of SCTP in certain setups where SCTP is not possible 
> otherwise, e.g. when blocked by firewalls or not supported by operating system kernels.
> 
> As part of my work on the sctplib userland SCTP implementation, I have 
> also implemented UDP encapsulation in sctplib. I intensively used it 
> in sctplib- based RSerPool setups.
> 
> 
> Fredag 22. mars 2013 12.19.40 skrev Gorry Fairhurst:
>> This email announces the start of a working group last call for 
>> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-14, "UDP Encapsulation of SCTP 
>> Packets for End-Host to End-Host Communication".  This document has 
>> completed an IETF LC and was updated after IESG review. This is now 
>> thought to be ready to proceed to be published as a PS by RFC-Ed. 
>> Please send any comments to the TSVWG list.
>> 
>> The draft is available at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-14
>> 
>> Summary of main changes:
>> 
>> * Clarification that the focus is on encapsulation between SCTP endpoints.
>> 
>> * UNSAF considerations added.
>> 
>> * Change from UDP checksum MUST be computed for SCTP/UDP/IPv6 to UDP 
>> checksum SHOULD be computed for SCTP/UDP/IPv6 to reflect recently 
>> changed UDP/IPv6 checksum handling, with rationale provided.
>> 
>> A diff between the version submitted to the IESG and the current 
>> version can be viewed using:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-0
>> 7.txt&u rl2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-udp-encaps-14.txt
>> 
>> This shortened last call will end on Friday 5th April 2013.
>> 
>> Emails saying "I support" or "I don't support" publication with these 
>> changes are also most  helpful in judging the WG consensus.
>> 
>> Please note another running SCTP WGLC also below.
>> 
>> James and Gorry
>> (TSVWG Chairs)
>> [e-mail]
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> 
>> This email announces the start of a working group last call for 
>> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-02.txt, "SACK-IMMEDIATELY 
>> Extension for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol". This 
>> document is now thought to be ready to proceed to be published as a 
>> PS. Please send any comments to the TSVWG list.
>> 
>> The draft is available at:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediatel
>> y/
>> 
>> The last call will run for TWO weeks, ending Friday 5th April 2013.
>> 
>> Emails saying "I support" or "I don't support" publication are also 
>> most  helpful in judging the WG consensus. Please let us know if this 
>> draft is useful and seems to provide the correct advice.
>> 
>> James, David and Gorry
>> (TSVWG Chairs)
>> [e-mail]