Re: Security issues with draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-08

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 09 November 2010 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2E33A6A1D for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:45:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AG2-meSIPrMC for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:45:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nitro.isi.edu (nitro.isi.edu [128.9.208.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7983A6A3B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:45:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by nitro.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA9JjilD015132 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:45:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4CD9A4E8.3080505@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 11:45:44 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Security issues with draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-08
References: <4CCD6B0B.5040804@isode.com> <p06240842c8f7b9ba2577@[10.20.30.150]> <4CD26D1B.7050900@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <4CD26D1B.7050900@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MailScanner-ID: oA9JjilD015132
X-ISI-4-69-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: tsvwg list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 19:45:45 -0000

On 11/4/2010 1:21 AM, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
> I think the intention was that additional ports for secure variants of
> existing services would still be endorsed by the ports review team.

Yes; we didn't talk about that part.

Joe