Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5127 (6970)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Wed, 11 May 2022 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2748BC15949A for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2022 15:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vXXzO_7_7-Ma for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2022 15:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D016C159A1D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2022 15:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C95C425C356; Wed, 11 May 2022 15:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ojrLvd7wWMf; Wed, 11 May 2022 15:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8726425C194; Wed, 11 May 2022 15:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220510160725.1D178119F0@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 15:11:12 -0700
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9A8B2A2A-34E7-46B8-B76B-91D644E08FB0@amsl.com>
References: <20220510160725.1D178119F0@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: khchan@nortel.com, babiarz@nortel.com, fred@cisco.com, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, david.black@dell.com, wes@mti-systems.com, tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/Cke9FHOZpa4Wam2V4CHVcaT9J2M>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5127 (6970)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 22:11:18 -0000

Greetings,

FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On May 10, 2022, at 9:07 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5127,
> "Aggregation of Diffserv Service Classes".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6970
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Sai Zin Lin Oo <zininoosai@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 5127
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_report.php 
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> https://www.anticaptcha.net/
> 
> Notes
> -----
> https://www.anticaptcha.net/
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5127 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-07)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Aggregation of Diffserv Service Classes
> Publication Date    : February 2008
> Author(s)           : K. Chan, J. Babiarz, F. Baker
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Transport Area Working Group
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>