Re: [tsvwg] draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim: Suggested Fragmentation/Reassembly text

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Wed, 09 October 2019 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6661200B7 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 08:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Da83_ejS5KYX for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 08:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79D0C120052 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 08:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id 72so1987691lfh.6 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=stIsdD5aXDQfmA0lqEVyTxelS5jyZT4ZsNKdDiVtoh0=; b=OUY4c1ScaCQBVUqFbyTVs0KojA41Vg1cQSwpoh00OJD6XPcA6MOHKtHGUnVWGZwuIO rn/4H4nx3KDDKFxKPU8GeeL5Nway2xnNEpIfs+gxroesE0cU+W15benG1so4T2/Ljtpj QeMorv9lztGN7vWoPULOZCu47nm03NKAqeQ0jJrPMYePvWS/oAGWKS+an6AiIwTFePfg hduOpfC4E2WV/ysWkLMR/T471xoGLumigazcn3ihgYhz8nUSWVFjABUR+2daPPKdsmVK RhhmS3vtzInbZHJNdwwUqgTMvzFC7zHS9rmXzsMOuGM3vmSnh64QApVVS1J2MSbhK2ZA ZJsg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=stIsdD5aXDQfmA0lqEVyTxelS5jyZT4ZsNKdDiVtoh0=; b=GgCw8W2FC2+o/COvgMoIoJAyMbPUG4Y638CWcP+TaAIpxbGar1VstFiDpE/YbADzqF tfr7wHp024KpChYmLdZeWAazgYcRNnYAFUoNEASUHl2xG7rdEuws2qC0li2EB1bSf1sJ Q4m1np2nSz40R1GgMmuqey3czmoDlJuPQ2yjflYt/sEdY8c0dwtY5XVI3xGgRgTt45EB qUgq15+plklSIr/DgHaxRLlSvQBlLnKw+QiUWkgRZTKAyTDBMVF31e8zf7ahNNeS4qXB bAWlCZZSsakDq7K2eu2l2mn1JI7LjUdIwuz4+2UDS++rxbwa+o2vsJpPi6KBdcmGD4MR uKYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWZbVMUGhVeDIHV8PBO647IyTLKshutj8aqux6y9I2L/suRXDok TfHDFnZX/Ok70YaTqCfB9lE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwu1bTnSSqIFsbegwas5kNk86tf7w8AJ5MfVxp/AbU1J3rrbalESsbX3ad9K25Zov2CpCPhMQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a19:4bcf:: with SMTP id y198mr2467368lfa.168.1570634771509; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:26:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-232-88-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.232.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x30sm527179ljd.39.2019.10.09.08.26.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 08:26:10 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936307688C5@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 18:26:05 +0300
Cc: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <08D31081-C754-4459-A3F5-3BBED91900CA@gmail.com>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949363076629A@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936307662EA@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <1920ABCD-6029-4E37-9A18-CC4FEBBFA486@gmail.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493630768173@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <6D176D4A-C0A7-41BA-807A-5478D28A0301@strayalpha.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936307688C5@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
To: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/CskqzaKV3oY88uFYW8gdmDQ5w5Y>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim: Suggested Fragmentation/Reassembly text
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 15:26:15 -0000

> On 9 Oct, 2019, at 5:59 pm, Black, David <David.Black@dell.com> wrote:
> 
> At this juncture, for an ECT(0)/ECT(1) mix across a set of fragments being reassembled, I would suggest using "any" (i.e., either is ok) at this juncture to avoid constraining what we may do in the future; in particular, this allows use of the value in the first or last fragment, both of which are likely to be convenient approaches for some implementations.

Makes sense to me.

 - Jonathan Morton