[tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5127 (6970)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 10 May 2022 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A82C15E6ED for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:07:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S7a0YP7JUCT7 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41B1EC159494 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 1D178119F0; Tue, 10 May 2022 09:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
To: khchan@nortel.com, babiarz@nortel.com, fred@cisco.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, david.black@dell.com, wes@mti-systems.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: zininoosai@gmail.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20220510160725.1D178119F0@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 09:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/D0Qs_T1NxLVdBLdTASUeAGRvJoY>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5127 (6970)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 16:07:29 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5127,
"Aggregation of Diffserv Service Classes".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6970

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Sai Zin Lin Oo <zininoosai@gmail.com>

Section: 5127

Original Text
-------------
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_report.php 


Corrected Text
--------------
https://www.anticaptcha.net/

Notes
-----
https://www.anticaptcha.net/

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC5127 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-class-aggr-07)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Aggregation of Diffserv Service Classes
Publication Date    : February 2008
Author(s)           : K. Chan, J. Babiarz, F. Baker
Category            : INFORMATIONAL
Source              : Transport Area Working Group
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG