[tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 23 June 2024 07:56 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 206C7C14F6A8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:56:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.706
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.706 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="TFm3AtPd"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="gLEl1Yey"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27kJZM98Jbyr for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wfhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfhigh6-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.157]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2F93C14F689 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E69180018F for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 03:39:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 23 Jun 2024 03:39:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1719128362; x=1719214762; bh=KeDoZ0TYQn8oJzYvm/+zLzUv6Fg8TtLgNQ8 oPtKCh/s=; b=TFm3AtPdpnt2P7L3NOQoRIFOKSWObPEDtyvq3vE38hP/DhJf/4R pboaJiwCCcA+HFOzLpOL8qbcvyvhN/CIgCqlSREMAopPrzZenPUo4L1NXbsVMaSB +oYMudQi/sZqDzCGVjlWepnFnlwILMylG7hvTJPwoGIHEgj6gNfHHNzWW7Bskz3Q MmhcxXuWGXjXbjE9vO40Fz8n+UmuVV9qusQhPvi6+LTzabc1URVco1BhKY5b1M2c NTeal+rZXHToSn246zcpJPCR+PtIlXUtfIagBnsqCKFdmqSxyp+jTN2V8BEUe0j3 pwbSwXazn2+bZ4w4I8fCfxE7kTFuoiM9jKw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1719128362; x= 1719214762; bh=KeDoZ0TYQn8oJzYvm/+zLzUv6Fg8TtLgNQ8oPtKCh/s=; b=g LEl1YeyUTpTOVVKluEVkmDEjB3ngDyB4rkFVjCkh4X+MWv2TixGj7FfhxPBjgnW4 PJ/O4I+9POrokczrUsWrtjxVZXd8odwT4j4zBB4kdW9orL1joGV6IubGqwmcZ3KM G246UOo/BguiYGhlbDHz8LTghxV8qkpzJrJ9CwWFh/uT0x+02psWWdC8Ih+btvpo acYwQdeFLUxCvWcxcv0Qto1x7VmqCRCkA5v9mpwqhzjbC6Z9N2b0F1nl0snRiuU8 cQwpAJ+EasvnG5/LYaPwtQz41GBT4FyTz+8eNFThVEmFG6GH7Ltc/TllXJPp5DHg bVo2HMfF36mt65HVuA1jw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:KtF3Zo7-A6NIqTqoXBMDE5l4wad5nQrEk94joxvhQXK0GEul8UCH_Q> <xme:KtF3Zp4SRRZOZ8aaD4nPR8RbO6f-21d9fAXm2tmbJjkY1ttKehF8glwbMmCqBy8cV 6yQP9R4t1Y8EhiboQ>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:KtF3Znc5K68J_7ZXJcDmFyMmrON5SHJ14D2GmWaklW1d4qEUSJVG4MOHJcyf>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfeefkedgleefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:KtF3ZtLNn9szXzVlCGKEkeIoeL5188JKxoXwj43dU8_uLCMV-W9ysg> <xmx:KtF3ZsIS0SuFTxDjnBaZNGwxbFR-V_aANs1_v4-8h6FbRdEq1VBNcA> <xmx:KtF3ZuzknYZ-crDb95zsj86Wk5Z4_p-NNib78FBKMh38BKPI31BFtA> <xmx:KtF3ZgISFFHMl4Geju0nHkXGD0ysBG5U8HCs8qmoG9NnWyv8qElJeg> <xmx:KtF3ZjX2bnEb4I54xH_B4o9oHl_Tjmj_pe2-hnVM4ZmtzEvzJeGgY-w2>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 03:39:22 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============1304333839397507642=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20240623075601.B2F93C14F689@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:56:01 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: IE64WK6TXJAFEFFMOSUGFFLCZ3NOG5DG
X-Message-ID-Hash: IE64WK6TXJAFEFFMOSUGFFLCZ3NOG5DG
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Weekly github digest (TSV Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/D3-ccMYuuHCcaWyKeDWF3_JYdDU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>



Issues
------
* tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options (+0/-0/💬2)
  2 issues received 2 new comments:
  - #29 Should UDP ExIDs be distinct from TCP ExIDs, or use a common namespace? (1 by jtouch)
    https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/29 
  - #28 IANA evaluation response (1 by Mike-Heard)
    https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/issues/28 [Expected resolved] 




Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-udp-options-dplpmtud
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-multipath-dccp
* https://github.com/tsvwg/careful-resume
* https://github.com/tsvwg/zero-checksum
* https://github.com/tsvwg/ietf-l4sops
* https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options