IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Draft Review Request - IRTP IANA Considerations

Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com> Thu, 06 January 2011 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <evnikita2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D91A3A6D0A for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:32:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.286, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rPAiDqEKIUpW for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:32:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f44.google.com (mail-bw0-f44.google.com [209.85.214.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA18E3A6CE7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jan 2011 21:32:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so16025444bwz.31 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:34:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tGc4/pwWNtJPA0KaDRmxYy4sxiVr86bc7lO+RiK90K0=; b=jIgmjsr/NFc1ucOocx398tzYpHXtkxFNZ697D+q+23XWfPPo6XHe1fsqtc3KiwTdn6 8HX5T7fzrqK2oNTaHa7zTvKWWhhyeexwQeFwiAEMBatWnGo81SOxxGxRFexFt0cbCB3Z vOWapigtoZRA9YbcCwUDa8WK6lCbZ6jJcbH50=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OsRaOlXYPypE2KryXqqJWDzd2nMQmPrHghwrVV9YBCFfwJ/npqELIiuyW+fRJMfcrJ lmtAX+bC57a2KxMHzT1tIlF/mKAgnLH7ViK7PLFyRaZX2NF3KDcW06U9Mz9ajqE+SSBk t7EwUknACKcG8KXABKaUTDuadYI+l7Za9DbN4=
Received: by 10.204.62.73 with SMTP id w9mr5741407bkh.11.1294292093420; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:34:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([195.191.104.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v25sm13209255bkt.6.2011.01.05.21.34.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 05 Jan 2011 21:34:51 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D25548C.5000800@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:35:08 +0200
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
Subject: Re: Draft Review Request - IRTP IANA Considerations
References: <4D1715BE.6040100@gmail.com> <4D199D89.4080508@gmail.com><00eb01cba6a5$b5606840$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net><4D1D6EB3.40803@gmail.com> <4D2223E4.2040104@isi.edu><D3AB3EC9-7C73-4CDA-8702-3B70CD778ED7@nokia.com><4D240101.6090308@gmail.com> <5131531F-D1E6-44F1-8FC0-94CBCF6CC2A8@isi.edu> <024801cbaccd$e347d580$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
In-Reply-To: <024801cbaccd$e347d580$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, tsvwg@ietf.org, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 05:32:50 -0000

05.01.2011 13:44, t.petch wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Touch"<touch@isi.edu>
> To: "Mykyta Yevstifeyev"<evnikita2@gmail.com>
> Cc:<gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>;<jccw@jccw.org>;<tsvwg@ietf.org>;
> <jmpolk@cisco.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 6:56 AM
> On Jan 4, 2011, at 9:26 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev<evnikita2@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> 04.01.2011 13:00, Lars Eggert wrote:
>>> On 2011-1-3, at 21:30, Joe Touch wrote:
>>>> At this point, they might be better moved to historic than anything else.
> There's no reason to have IANA track or manage their values.
>>> As an individual WG participant, I fully agree with Joe.
>> Lars
>>
>> As I have mentioned before, I can agree with this only for IRTP (and maybe for
> RDP), but not NETBLT. I have recently made a draft moving IRTP to historic -
> here is a link
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yevstifeyev-tsvwg-irtp-to-historic/
>>
>> Maybe there is no doubt that this protocol should be Historic - so could you
> please sponsor the publication of this document as RFC?
>
> There us also neither a need nor a utility. Is there some other reason you ate
> trying so hard to get an RFC published?
If you mean IRTP IANA Considerations, I have asked to withdraw it. Now I 
propose tsvwg-irtp-to-historic-00.
> Joe
>
> You may have seen
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg65008.html
> if not I suggest you take a look and respond.  It is a forward of
> an IESG message for a Last Call.
>
> Tom Petch
>
>
>
>
> Joe=
>
>

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status