IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-13.txt

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sun, 20 June 2021 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3183A0D1A; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 12:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.454
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.454 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9t1rFXiZqknA; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 12:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D029D3A0D18; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 12:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ccxN5bhLXsihRkMvEh0Z3CD5JKLoEBk9FWv58Xf2DG0=; b=FYJiT6xUtLB/GTT2VTRZeyrzfq XFTzfPWlKA+7Nte5WcbN1x40v6QNjW5opaTJ6v62bxWjlrBknIbOjMai44FVNqg9LqbWbPtlHvlSg L4ETS5MVWGQY4rLIxcDerZ8UsRy82Mvz5hOZzQxxsdNZIn1kDUQyLdVR2F5ii0hwnKgKXJgCeqj5s xpFUkrSI4eNltuHS1EJmMESeG6Nuns78kXJ5OKFg6mvYi1wRMfS/AVXf1Tm00Enw1q/PORJO/0k/w 7D2vb0uEYv5Md7XIGDnYZsgQBql3iuE9BPtOA2iQTNle8Lk2hDN655LC8xs06ijJHzzRNPD8+fNnV 3S6q2z4w==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:49431 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1lv39z-001hX2-KC; Sun, 20 Jun 2021 15:31:16 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <16266BFE-A9C0-4DD9-A878-E5D51056CC2F@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 12:31:10 -0700
Cc: TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>, i-d-announce@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D7BC68ED-619F-4F7D-BCE5-4E4B65077FF4@strayalpha.com>
References: <162408795080.21706.5548660195641640175@ietfa.amsl.com> <C2C396E7-B728-496E-841B-D9F64004D3E3@strayalpha.com> <20210620043304.c6xerpura7lyw6yo@family.redbarn.org> <95274A1D-3C51-4D40-A5AB-7E8A4AEFDD1B@strayalpha.com> <20210620171249.le6tjyi7h66jggq2@family.redbarn.org> <1599550B-FF22-4DF3-9467-9C157E6F39AC@strayalpha.com> <16266BFE-A9C0-4DD9-A878-E5D51056CC2F@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/DFMAfVx6hdXwvQmynQffLxiXkw4>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-13.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2021 19:31:23 -0000

> On Jun 20, 2021, at 12:01 PM, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jun 20, 2021, at 20:51, Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
>> 
>> FWIW, there is no guidance on TCP transmitting its 10 segments back to back, AFAICT.
> 
> Not sure about guidance here, but there is some data on what is done in the existing internet....
> IIUC not all relevant player seem to limit the initial window to 10, see e.g. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.08937.pdf. Some of these seem to pace packets exceeding 10, others do not (or rather did not when that paper's data was acquired). 

Thanks for the pointer. This suggests few (if any) pace up to 10.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email