RE: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 19 March 2011 20:12 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E9B3A69BD for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FvRSnlQMK98F for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8303B3A69BB for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2JKEIPe018182 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:14:18 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (genld-224-034.t-mobile.co.uk [149.254.224.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2JKDROE017994 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:14:10 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <20110316220948.75DF39962F7@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20110316220948.75DF39962F7@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Subject: RE: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:13:26 -0000
Message-ID: <002d01cbe672$37594a90$a60bdfb0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIxYdjC4UXKcLcisfKszLFThIp3SpNqGbuQ
Content-Language: en-gb
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 20:12:49 -0000
I, too, think it would be good to advance and complete this draft. I have a preference for WG-driven where we have a WG that covers the area since it removes ambiguity in the consensus process. Seems like tsvwg would be a fine place for this. I do not think it is one of the drafts that should find its way to one of the Routing Area working groups. Cheers, Adrian (RSVP Directorate member - for all that that means!) > -----Original Message----- > From: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Scott O. Bradner > Sent: 16 March 2011 22:10 > To: tsvwg@ietf.org > Subject: Re: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 > > > I very much support this doc being finished up - it is very > useful technology > > if the tsvwg is able to do the work I'd support that path > > thanks > > Scott
- Fwd: Re: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-… Gorry Fairhurst
- draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 ken carlberg
- Re: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 Scott O. Bradner
- Re: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 Fred Baker
- Re: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 Scott O. Bradner
- Re: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 Bruce Davie
- Re: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 Lou Berger
- Re: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 James M. Polk
- RE: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 Adrian Farrel
- draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 ken carlberg
- Re: draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-06 Gorry Fairhurst