[tsvwg] Re: Minutes from IETF 122

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Tue, 25 March 2025 17:51 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsvwg@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32EC123BF42 for <tsvwg@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.987
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.987 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=erg.abdn.ac.uk
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E-asx3ERfrDj for <tsvwg@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [137.50.19.135]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD5B123BF3A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 10:51:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.130] (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CF271B0022C; Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:51:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=erg.abdn.ac.uk; s=default; t=1742925079; bh=tdH4IUzmYH5Dbm/nayPJ8LPmkxmE6WUsYmaOdS2jHsc=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=BlE3avP/YHxPY5jdEnQk/887FDOIgOKMfUZsODgrZqyIQvWYJPQMtFlZj+L8eWXj/ 8LxpmMdrjq9bZPwu87IsbXo34uaMg6DpdiYA4OcFigImRTY7wFLLHLxdthKbs9aIgv MzVjDFOHKhntuL+5Cc4V+kluu9pfrtECQSYe0e/5tz2VKrIb7SeM7+3tYUk0rsnMMD MT9r1Fcdrhdb+br5RHjnuwm4dFWYpXj9XajvdGPneqbPdG7qhSCS0YJTLuYI4TspvD O0hj3LJWLIGgWV9zVXDfVQKmFjr5q5JApPCSDatQjH/D2AXACmAs+4MyLbvW17rLVY LYKurW3HMO0Zg==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------GX0a3ab5eyGS2m0mnWwysVY2"
Message-ID: <42987206-ebdd-4f9c-84d4-e2a6a9cf45ab@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:51:16 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-GB
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <CAM4esxR=4NKfz8RqFfFk7175OOR_jdhG+BGrBQyKk09=6HREDA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Organization: UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxR=4NKfz8RqFfFk7175OOR_jdhG+BGrBQyKk09=6HREDA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID-Hash: HGZYMXRML3VAA4S5SBEFXD63AWT332C7
X-Message-ID-Hash: HGZYMXRML3VAA4S5SBEFXD63AWT332C7
X-MailFrom: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Re: Minutes from IETF 122
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/EVi4se9GaY0_cUqs2kRJba1SNgQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>

On 24/03/2025 22:01, Martin Duke wrote:
> Here are the WG minutes from IETF 122
>
> https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-122-tsvwg
>
> Please email tsvwg-chairs if you have any corrections to make no later 
> than 7 April, anywhe\re in the world.
>
> Martin

Thanks for providing these. I expect there are few lines that ought to 
best be corrected, e.g.:

/Martin Duke (as Chair) has you already got feedback, is this already 
been reviewed? Do people need to review it?/Martin Duke (as Chair) have 
you already got feedback, is this already reviewed?/

Please add the response:

- The answer is that most of the text was reviewed in the WGLC for CR, 
where it was suggested to update based on the new qlog format and 
position in a separate draft.

/If there are any additional missing text please send comment./If there 
is any additional missing text please send a comment./

/Zahed as AD intends to approve text on UDP Option??/ Zahed (as AD) 
intends to approve the text for DPLPMTU for UDP-Options/

/Uses PIE from 8033, with modification, only use timestamps for queue 
delay calculation. Uses FQ as described in 8290./

/Uses PIE from RFC 8033, with modification, this only use timestamps for 
queue delay calculation. Uses FQ as described in RFC 8290./


  /
  /
  <https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-122-tsvwg#Individual-Drafts-Related-Talks-and-New-Work>

Best wishes,

Gorry

(as an individual)

/ 
<https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-122-tsvwg#Individual-Drafts-Related-Talks-and-New-Work>


  // <https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-122-tsvwg#5-SCTP-Encryption>



  // <https://notes.ietf.org/notes-ietf-122-tsvwg#5-SCTP-Encryption>