[tsvwg] draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-08 and SFR
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Fri, 04 December 2020 22:59 UTC
Return-Path: <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CD13A0FFA for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:59:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2pneeyuw2a9T for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:59:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72d.google.com (mail-qk1-x72d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C9C3A0FF9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 14:59:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72d.google.com with SMTP id v143so7121357qkb.2 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:59:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition; bh=eEYOGcncrC1T2nBqVB56MNDsKxWc8jMUJIAzVpAVpyU=; b=DwUeUVYUKD53g/XgOVDgIuBGisxzMInFEb6gbc8G+M6Hix6JQjaQPKebYdUqTXCVoK fwT+pe8yzQ+Xk6f3PTNq46Pfzqextc/mibWVPWJYzhiw1ie9kiU3rLUXvXjEL1yVMQD1 gqgkNhJNsVj6/dIach7OY5CCNFR613se9AHa/ZPJFHWYoShJ6u+72VQomQ6GmHzepA/p nZ8PZkRTbi2UIZ5JhrvhhE/KFbyNm/PU7t81WZ+pnBfrGiLOu7aFoP5rgewI2fWWXK49 ZEmmFT/W4EpINkvFLhclrni8wH+Wshdxe8F/GlHUQ4C+ypyasO66F9PoHEog8I55JmLB LX4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition; bh=eEYOGcncrC1T2nBqVB56MNDsKxWc8jMUJIAzVpAVpyU=; b=mY+s6zRZmrpsvzvXKw9vyf4wQ1TIMnFOPVIc+DEyplXMR6d9R8eZB85rQDxhvQlyid YKEB/MguLvcKK78mdeKSK5Hw0b3x9Ir4Y6WTpS0qTOoEmewtTBhLruEy9lXjF0B4VzEP GbsA8oeptvXlnPF0Y1zbcSm/pKnuXoY1fxD+7WArCJ7iM9e4LJlqlf/VtF08u3BklGHB YUYefxCi1KwlCKhire01sGmpxoW30s2qr99RQSRySdrQH9klwbbhQDshAtvqA2TW5PJ6 g+vKlpmZ8/boU+/pfJYA1IGksr6H3q3VByVPDSt+LeUYiWS72px9xWywOUt/W2n+dndL 95/g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532rVCseejOKcJ+ZZxbW5A0TaKwECTa0em5tCqFjzYLuxS3mEC/c VfwjvOOTHmRYA1g+lu1xZYw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrztPVRMh7nOaVlz4i0qCy5aG3fl61WPpoLwJb6j2anAvNv8pwIxlsz1Y+tM8EgQkOL8RkyA==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a396:: with SMTP id m144mr11701128qke.228.1607122773459; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:59:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2001:1284:f013:2581:45e:a093:3227:95f1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c7sm5747317qtw.70.2020.12.04.14.59.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:59:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2CCBCC4BB1; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 19:59:30 -0300 (-03)
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 19:59:30 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Cc: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Message-ID: <20201204225930.GG449907@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/EWZKO5V-yvpGCA_T-YSo67xO4C4>
Subject: [tsvwg] draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-08 and SFR
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 22:59:36 -0000
Hi, Was it considered to add the Split Fast Retransmit from [1,2] to 4690bis instead? It might be a too big change for a bis edition, more complex, but it helps to better isolate path characteristics. SCTP already has a cwnd per destination, and drops on different, likely unrelated, paths shouldn't interfere on another's cwnd. I understand that if not in CMT context, the gains out of it may not be appealing enough, as in theory it would be most effective only during path fail overs. 1.http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNET.2006.882843 2.https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-tuexen-tsvwg-sctp-multipath-20#section-3.1 Best regards, Marcelo
- [tsvwg] draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-08 and SFR Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
- Re: [tsvwg] draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-bis-08 and S… Michael Tuexen