IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Process for re-assignment of NS TCP header flag to AccECN

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 12 July 2017 21:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EEB1317CE for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=ietf@kuehlewind.net header.d=kuehlewind.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tWRoY5yTBSSz for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BAED1317DE for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 14:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kuehlewind.net; b=tUGnBf+6qUIlH9KFYW9GnnS5E5ME7jusNJ6kfpmEZPXgob/8x0j9dSfz21q+fzPcc3sPGGWH+w83C+WE8CWOyCn8fkUVdkmrp1VkJR0t2kYS/qqHzojnEwqxLWqllgwImhKpCGGIYcBHCAE+XR0x+cohJhI/pSNslES3JJsorhU=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-PPP-Message-ID:X-PPP-Vhost;
Received: (qmail 5971 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2017 23:30:33 +0200
Received: from p5dec20b4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (93.236.32.180) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 12 Jul 2017 23:30:33 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-c93egv3huWMRwLWuNZN5gVR6zjNym0v2ztpF3wyFG5LA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 23:30:32 +0200
Cc: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>, G Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, tsvwg-chairs <tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>, tsv-ads <tsv-ads@ietf.org>, tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <791F99EC-0103-4BA6-B9AD-2CC1A5EF82E7@kuehlewind.net>
References: <CACL_3VG9NNPCSkReLA7jGLoRWpo09+YvVKMCzddEcdWKNtdgDw@mail.gmail.com> <6c0e7bc8-7e25-99b0-cf7d-7542871060ad@bobbriscoe.net> <CACL_3VGQFhOpjwAMO7Ajh-5=pA7wz6witU6ZmiKNsnm0MYQCSA@mail.gmail.com> <49200576-B166-4FE9-8B5D-36ECA5509364@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <99989ba2-4dae-eb6e-90fe-cb4b19f20594@bobbriscoe.net> <595BB715.70700@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CAKKJt-cONV77GUGHJ74LQXJK6BGZH4JNYkDbFXTYNEpz9OxV4A@mail.gmail.com> <ad33e842-d55d-70ee-3bc5-88012d532ef3@bobbriscoe.net> <CAKKJt-e5toxQ6HHQX+0ZV8W35v=JTCtT5OwrHhZkHptS08X63A@mail.gmail.com> <F1ECF3F9-94D9-4180-A9A1-F05B5A280CA1@gmail.com> <b381c31f-8c5b-7d11-ffd6-2b06fb37520b@bobbriscoe.net> <FF6F1588-F8C0-4CB1-9830-59F2417BFACC@gmail.com> <CAKKJt-c93egv3huWMRwLWuNZN5gVR6zjNym0v2ztpF3wyFG5LA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-PPP-Message-ID: <20170712213033.5959.66914@lvps83-169-45-111.dedicated.hosteurope.de>
X-PPP-Vhost: kuehlewind.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/EhoWra9KG91q1oGSvxstPEZSBlU>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Process for re-assignment of NS TCP header flag to AccECN
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 21:30:37 -0000

Hi all,

let’s still meet in the AD office hours because it would actually be good to chat before the tcpm and tsvwg sessions. And then we maybe can catch up with Micheal at the receipt. Who would able able to be there Sunday at 3pm (besides Micheal)?

If we need another meeting, I can probably move my Monday lunch meeting and we could do Monday lunch right after the tcpm session...?

Mirja



> Am 12.07.2017 um 18:32 schrieb Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>:
> 
> Dear All,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Jul 11, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> wrote:
> >
> > Fred,
> > For Wed, IETF agenda says "1200-1300  WG Chairs Forum"
> > I assume some tcpm & tsvwg WG chairs plan to attend?
> 
> My comment was in response to yours, that herding WG Chairs and ADs into a common space was "interesting". That is an interval in which we are all supposed to be in one room (actuality may vary).
> 
> I hadn't thought Fred's suggestion through, until I realized that I haven't seen an e-mail for the WG Chairs Forum with an agenda YET (which is disturbing, but not relevant except that it makes us huddling at the beginning, end, or even middle of that time seem very reasonable). If the answer is that the chairs are gonna eat lunch and chat in small groups, that will be very easy for me to break away from.
> 
> So, yes, please continue to discuss via e-mail, but Wednesday lunch will be a time I can be cornered.
> 
> Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email