IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] CC/bleaching thoughts for draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-04

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 09 April 2018 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A57631204DA; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hQMWDFuZDCu1; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0813E12D7EC; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 13:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f15so6417727pfn.0; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 13:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jr0CriUk2PAAqy+eYQTX8N91WA4U540Tr7GObBRIluI=; b=bTZF3TEp+1b0KRn/Fk7+wSK81oh4cbCLvwFzcGCLo/8NOGxWvuHYhS0/CgzRHczV5z yMzsQUl+N+rsnCpKokMCHxVnFhV3IWMNPA5zOCavf01556EwQCiJJPEhe+cKbVuxuDgk Teu2PXCsIlvu7BR/b+TYLB4us4nFHNbVrJLv2M/4CbuVo9qXIurgIaz6N0OvE5HYeh6P cjrjKw+/Oc5oGMogmtl1o1rXSmVb1t/reDmGNh5El68bTjVqwmBuSWdOB+dPrF4Dri4s YuQxKwIt37fWVYaORLWd+4eGG/UM1B6B3+J+wx5nPCzjiEd9RKu9Ix/k3Hj6fatxzUX2 j9nQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jr0CriUk2PAAqy+eYQTX8N91WA4U540Tr7GObBRIluI=; b=E+MZEJODhk5ngVG3aSb1zaxE5j82MuOjuqUjRgT9qDAbSCgM6rmLOACv8O/asZzvDt bQWiHpJyWXJMMMfVlomhvosrPAtb5qCq3anj4YA85EOKuXt8Ej1SW5v3rKkdWd3V9x4T ooyhXeaA+oB/QFmp2LmomKnl23pBZa5PXnshw1vzkL565b0LuR9MJlPY+dVNARrQVE+k Q6pWLZvWhfQwa7NIhLrOeJq3y5ZeGo0XSSQ4TvuR1a7qgnhNKrfAT+rPR3tslGS8HQMn f8CLP8gyXmAiH+XZrBnPnEzmpaI5OHBh1+9HubAaIr99F65U96e/wONJHeRnc59nCdtM FZ5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7H7YVNCkPClZ0mfZQyFFIBBuG5vomwejVzfuOLG2PWhjvrUlCbu FiZ2TYOZFsj17ZVcM36a0vPKUg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49iu8kxlC5DUaEIP66lSi6cAmJUtoY+ws1HWCPWizdVl+XRifqxxbg8ZmiByyvZOFVpBWHj6g==
X-Received: by 10.101.77.67 with SMTP id j3mr26763129pgt.210.1523307134270; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 13:52:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] (92.244.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.244.92]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g186sm2227270pfb.3.2018.04.09.13.52.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Apr 2018 13:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Brian Carpenter <becarpenter46@gmail.com>
To: Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de, tte@cs.fau.de
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb@ietf.org
References: <20180406160344.xwfqgzhzfto56jhq@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <LEJPR01MB1033F43509F08701B2B5EA1D9CBF0@LEJPR01MB1033.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <82d646b7-d475-64d6-9f0b-f75e3daeeaca@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 08:52:10 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <LEJPR01MB1033F43509F08701B2B5EA1D9CBF0@LEJPR01MB1033.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/F1mz4ljsg2XkmBDeo67JYXQt3a4>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] CC/bleaching thoughts for draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-04
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 20:52:17 -0000

On 09/04/2018 19:13, Ruediger.Geib@telekom.de wrote:
...
> My general view is: don't link determined end to end transport behavior to DSCP values bearing no 
> end to end significance.

+many. The fact that DSCP meanings are domain-specific is so fundamental
that coupling them to e2e transport behaviour is condemned to failure.
(Which we spent a lot of time explaining to the WebRTC folk.) Very different
from ECN.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email