From nobody Sun May 23 14:06:20 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8223A2630 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:06:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.848 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tXj_B6JAuYkE for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E7B93A2636 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id j6so35007819lfr.11 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:06:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wrZrjfPMHoDg3WB8Nju08DuG13fU0o1LARgdWO9/jzs=; b=OhWJwkminR/7614Kghvl85Ngqt7o8d6lIqbdfrwE7j/j3efaptNuAvR+aNZ3wDgDz/ ieYUTNhpqdAElRQ36sChU4blpZ5k03fv2as6+hhbMqq1y9l1tJYRI8vzd97dJ+irsXfG EOyWxOXC0uVkON7TmGERapnwKtSWd3beWnS+8rbZTABQGfFHR3qiVW5BaFqGrQQ7CF5d OjGk3IQkFwwS66i6u05vZgRNVkutPq87I/AfbXtpsKHj9UVuCR538XWnIMpKCylh67Kd 1vUHvDqPlTbO3fTiJdglsLZdM+Vz5tmXzpkmaNjjaBu/PXVEu/oWCyPZ9rta0Fzc+sLZ BdIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=wrZrjfPMHoDg3WB8Nju08DuG13fU0o1LARgdWO9/jzs=; b=ISSL2NHhCW7L2tWmBvDEeBUqIVGoGvhyUFqPOJ3rrWGjNt+uoXXrn+x8Z/PSSI7sM/ mzzapnGkyLNOhUHivY6+OLGsJMIWcJXQiHcKaxpiVfU+aWXfH0dySsdPUmJhGbzNVrX1 zAPIkCiLx7tZTGVs1PCZ62OuKlUPtnZAliDKFrC5k/VKsG7an5f/Jm3jHtXGSzv1wCIp +CZqjU3P9DAX1GIx2ZYEQ31qNW4PGR9DpRdT1icfhfbdbsWVDGp07uxoDfJRnQCa6LME wZEiZZnlHuBiO1t+9a+AnDtKoVO3CRe1MQqRrWYZ+/zIFfhpFx8bN5/+03hTfcWTkjBi 5A6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533N4duuIB/6wJR3GvOkID82K6/sOEy9AmDvgKGmfgQ6m5OpjZGg mOaB+r2A0A/oL+YcllvgQWQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykCOZHwa+vA5QvldJLG7MlN37W672MOMrEOS6mzfsfFJ8auzFI2ktPI+vzcp1YZKw2E8uMSA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:8084:: with SMTP id b126mr8662225lfd.572.1621803972627; Sun, 23 May 2021 14:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (37-136-237-77.rev.dnainternet.fi. [37.136.237.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z20sm1503985ljz.33.2021.05.23.14.06.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 May 2021 14:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 00:06:11 +0300 Cc: Sebastian Moeller , tsvwg@ietf.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9CD16885-2E58-4A3E-B19D-E612FCE3EBD1@gmail.com> References: <162158815765.22731.15608328324211025925@ietfa.amsl.com> <3F147A3D-BD68-4F0A-89FF-9A92284FF0A5@gmx.de> To: Bob Briscoe X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [tsvwg] New rev of draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-17 X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Transport Area Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 21:06:20 -0000 > On 23 May, 2021, at 11:54 pm, Bob Briscoe wrote: >=20 > BTW, the C-queue target has never been 25ms. I noticed JM said that = incorrectly as well recently. It looks an awful lot like 25ms in some tests we did earlier this week. - Jonathan Morton=