Re: [tsvwg] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-09: (with DISCUSS)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 21 February 2019 04:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23B7129441; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:20:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PGWpzPjIDRoy; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E19B12785F; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.29] (cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1L4KcLt087133 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:20:40 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1550722843; bh=maYUtxqfQH7EGaUDEF5bp+hlbAsszPaDIDiqV7AVd84=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=hJsQfcXE4LT6060VnXKuQSLtnjSm/12dKv3nrza39v2IpFz6l55adXFZD546G65cE ZLeoDg2mWj7RI6rjpAR/x6NduJn7W6McV/1V+Ms3NNiqFU6tX3Vs5gY7dKqCp9elCn GFPf7Foh+jJbdeYl6lA9zLBMLAx+JHGDNSWdv4P8=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106] claimed to be [10.0.1.29]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <F7FD002A-ECCB-4133-A07B-E793B2D9F4D3@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D462B9C7-993C-4E04-9897-775C6BA7392F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:20:38 -0600
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-eLK-YvFMqzhJ=jpfZzkqxafeujQq9bQ1TjD-F-VX7euw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, "draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb@ietf.org>, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>, tsvwg-chairs <tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <155068474129.31466.15846713019514634227.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKKJt-c9OypSeE30iP=bVvecJfLLHsHH1O2J=oD2wVKqxyjbzQ@mail.gmail.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936304653DD@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <609E5511-E737-452A-96DB-0F5008BAAADE@nostrum.com> <CAKKJt-eSMn1ZCnEfVu6rFrYvm=38OJU1f23C21Rxu8EQVvQLFg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-eLK-YvFMqzhJ=jpfZzkqxafeujQq9bQ1TjD-F-VX7euw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/Fqo9EJ34AGkSEJa5-Mp1awWjLQM>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-tsvwg-le-phb-09: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 04:20:50 -0000


> On Feb 20, 2019, at 6:40 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> After consulting with Heather and with Sandy, I have added this RFC Editor note:
> 
> RFC Editor Note
> 
>    Because this draft formally updates draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos,
>    which is approved but waiting in the MISSREF state, we ask the RFC Editor
>    to take the following actions:
> 
>    Please make the changes described in Section 12 of this draft to
>    draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos.
> 
>    Please replace [RFCXXXX] in the updated text with the RFC number
>    assigned to this draft.
> 
>    Please add [RFCXXXX] (with the RFC number assigned to this draft) as
>    a normative reference in draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos.
> 
>    Please remove Section 12 from this draft (because all those changes
>    have already been applied).

If it works for Heather and Sandy, it works for me.

> 
> If this looks right, Ben, could you clear your Discuss?

Done.

Thanks!

Ben.