Re: [tsvwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-17: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 03 April 2020 12:37 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8B63A174A; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 05:37:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yipw1NHtvvHS; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 05:37:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 646E63A14A3; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 05:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2a.google.com with SMTP id s194so1921996vkb.11; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 05:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BpdhVUx+KXU8x5h30Ci+g34iqWz+dadiZ49KUNhXnjo=; b=lebOn8qmZu5tFFQaEBW2l4QIRYtjJT2WE6rRVK0dwJ4vyMMRJ1EPNFXzemBJsxEkqN K6qpafXQ8HteSEY8IHkL5QxaU+DmT/VclAIRPavLHgqM22n6LNZsy0TqLY/HWht3XeV5 /9muAMZyVNJ0UIuZGp98dcEVhqbCD32ew1G71vop6afZHi8TN4utaeF/sqwNloEvgEyz LJa2Xq6dufjUA7SYrBml4WWPrBMpNmGy9uL5VgSF+eXE5taS9cj+4jhU3XXJgKSOJVk4 bmxrNNW+5XYdQjC+4C96BC5ljpyv6utpyNrPZtsKQens3/Byx+gfqpHg1kfyHhVVzR/f khrw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BpdhVUx+KXU8x5h30Ci+g34iqWz+dadiZ49KUNhXnjo=; b=ntcfz5TBzzpr2qH0/Ec4ZfdnIC1Tz2qEa0/Ht3xg5niXe0ebxwcoQpXfnGuotsAFai N4Fy/pKVWP78Un+EFDGgzgtVobU08Kw2U2110mb2yG1FJftWR8WKloFRNiYVMxyeIxll SwgfUvTE8hURklZacC9bSrZa6FlfIkTVHI2m+UoCLedpL9miMWBdjYknzqm6mETMzeGL niKJ9sUOk3LdGzhtlxKZEsecEvLWfVPZ4A3ZWnwZ2S2SytPNup3N0/QLWIqVyNw544PE 4O1tcuTsof+i5/0J0d66tRJNYcF8xaVQvsNISMSBEmTyfi8D+NiR5jpDPzP/3rfmQ9Bt jKxw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubXOJ/m7POv2bHsiPOWEI/ReYF4fMpyauwKDz8AxtcsRXJS8Rwr q8W0YIEYcXrGm6QweztmQyFNtve9tHjfxC5daLFTx+T7DGQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLX1QEx7T12CNGwqGPMioCk4a0rwETAsd6gVdDY5wfBBLyTvpP3CUGCSDRHHSgSrrZum76wS2xwqiez/qpQBjA=
X-Received: by 2002:ac5:cbd5:: with SMTP id h21mr6242702vkn.60.1585917431255; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 05:37:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158567197145.28499.17719634613395272227@ietfa.amsl.com> <48d8f4fa-2478-8200-c082-1d9f46b2530d@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CAL0qLwaOOm6Btdi2wsO3TpdRxTmPaXkWy5Rn8YsoqiOOfkpd6Q@mail.gmail.com> <3f73e422-a721-0865-35dc-3b64dd153d9f@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <3f73e422-a721-0865-35dc-3b64dd153d9f@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 05:36:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwb6hDat4bUF04GPGDMPbiT=LB94vNDmJ8ejjTxUaQ9oow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud@ietf.org, tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002219dc05a2622d4e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/GJ3BrgSmJSpvC6qOlWKsKBVy_5M>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 12:37:23 -0000

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:10 AM Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
wrote:

> Would this work:
>
> OLD:
>
> Probe packets: On request, a DPLPMTUD sender is REQUIRED to be
>         able to transmit a packet larger than the PLMPMTU.
>         This is used to send a probe packet.  ...
>
> NEW:
>
> Probe packets: The network interface below PL is REQUIRED to provide
>         a way to transmit a probe packet that is larger than the PLMPMTU. ...
>
>
Yes, that's much better.  Thanks!

-MSK