Re: [tsvwg] Review comments on a careful read of the L4S ID (#2: RTT Variance)

[Bob Briscoe <[e-mail]>]

See [BB]...

On 06/05/2021 07:52, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
>
> =================================================================
> *2 Abstract  RTT variance*
> **
> Abstract text says:
> “The two changes counterbalance each other so that the
> throughput of an L4S flow will be roughly the same as a non-L4S flow
> under the same conditions.”
>
> ⁃Please insert “comparable” before “non-L4S flow” to avoid bogus flow 
> comparisons.
> **
> =================================================================
> *7. Introduction needs to sidestep RTT variance*
> **
> This text:
> “Thetwo changes counterbalance
> each other so that the throughput of an L4S flow will be roughly the
> same as a non-L4S flow under the same conditions.”
> **
> ⁃Please insert “comparable” before “non-L4S flow” to avoid bogus flow 
> comparisons.
>
> =================================================================
>

[BB] Isn't 'under the same conditions' already a more precise way of 
saying 'comparable'?

Proposed resolution: No text changes.

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/