IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tsvwg] Re: WGLC for comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options and draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud to end 1st May 2024

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Tue, 07 May 2024 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D2DC14F6A2 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2024 08:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mWjYG73o9Deu for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2024 08:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C23ACC14EB19 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2024 08:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CDE1E826 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2024 11:04:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=qjj9yLcthtT8v5+uY6/oBeKN4L6KGjku PKqMURcjrTM=; b=NDfRxvvWy3+u0gyTMQgANq4ZWewk3NOwAu0xHNHMRDdCkk21 5KYNkyJgYOoNmIjaZdDYIg6Han+KUbWFTF3yf+tEpg4ott+PSkFcl49q7F+ypr+e JDgKyinugcom1Jt0YaQr2UC9VesOQZ/oE0ygR0vJk2jeRNz7UfkPtxIBIJQ=
Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6AC1E825 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2024 11:04:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com (unknown [209.85.208.45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CFD711E824 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2024 11:04:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-56e48d0a632so116328a12.2 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 May 2024 08:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzc3iUPXPKu2GpWU1sPqKiKcZ9zSqGJboUt3cY6sfjO9YSSWKxk h4BE/rs+n9lgCPRE+PX/u4Iww5zrxtZbEmFyJbPId0f2M4kRUmwsL9WlXmtd4XOoXG4N4ZcPwbK X/Jvctd1kpFEtaNYXDNcWMsc2/00=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEbNg2iAu84iLMTJCrmYQ2rctVycV44g/phooHzH2e4jyoXwjcskNvguI1Ivxzk8EKvqMg1tAaNOleMIz6Jz1Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:9505:0:b0:572:a71e:b8fa with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5731d9d1b58mr4854a12.16.1715094288994; Tue, 07 May 2024 08:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0f72bf81-5fd1-490d-9077-051ce5ebebc0@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <20240503085711.GA9028@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
In-Reply-To: <20240503085711.GA9028@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 08:04:38 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VEszVBZ-TV3c8E6T9X7O_gRZeG4hvv1E_D1k6_AShwXug@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VEszVBZ-TV3c8E6T9X7O_gRZeG4hvv1E_D1k6_AShwXug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da265a0617de81dd"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 268B2C38-0C83-11EF-9A42-25B3960A682E-06080547!pb-smtp2.pobox.com
Message-ID-Hash: QHOPMMAKVPPZHNHGMHIVZ6Q6ZSYD7TTZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: QHOPMMAKVPPZHNHGMHIVZ6Q6ZSYD7TTZ
X-MailFrom: heard@pobox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Re: WGLC for comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options and draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud to end 1st May 2024
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/HcXeqNyqtICnQyyDhWzGVhORB0I>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>

  Erik,

I opened Issue #30
<https://github.com/tsvwg/draft-udp-options-dplpmtud/issues/30> to cover
the following comments. If
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-12
(just
posted) satisfactorily addresses them, please let us know.

Mike Heard

On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 1:57 AM Erik Auerswald <auerswal@unix-ag.uni-kl.de>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> a bit late, but here are a few nits regarding
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud-11:
>
>   * Section 3.2 on page 6 refers to wrong section of
>     I-D.ietf-tsvwg-udp-options for EOL:
>
>         (Section 9.1 of [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-udp-options])
>     --->
>         (Section 11.1 of [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-udp-options])
>
>   * Section 4.2 on page 8 uses "Maximum Segment Size" / "MSS" instead of
>     "Maximum Datagram Size" / "MDS":
>
>         ...When the remote endpoint advertises a UDP Maximum
>         Segment Size (MSS) option,...
>     --->
>         ...When the remote endpoint advertises a UDP Maximum
>         Datagram Size (MDS) option,...
>
>   * Section 4.4 on page 9 has a wrong section reference for the UDP
>     Options API:
>
>         ...(Section 13 of
>         [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-udp-options]).
>     --->
>         ...(Section 15 of
>         [I-D.ietf-tsvwg-udp-options]).
>
> Best regards,
> Erik
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 08:02:12PM +0100, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
> > This is a reminder of the on-going 3 weeks WG Last Call to determine if
> the
> > following TSVWG IDs are ready:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options/
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud/
> >
> > These documents both target PROPOSED STANDARD.
> >
> > The document shepherd for the UDP Options will be: Gorry Fairhurst.
> > The document shepherd for DPLPMTUD with UDP Options will be: Marten
> Seemann.
> >
> > The WGLC will end at midnight UTC on 1st May 2024.
> >
> > Please do read the drafts, and please do send any comments/concerns
> > to  the TSVWG mailing list, including notes on whether these are
> > ready to publish (or send an email directly to the
> > chairs<tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>).
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Gorry and Marten
> > (tsvwg co-chairs)
> >
> > —
> >
> > The IETF WG Last Call process is described in RFC 6174.
> >
>
>

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status