Re: [tsvwg] UDP options and header-data split (zero copy)

Paul <paul@redbarn.org> Fri, 16 July 2021 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFF83A2A4E for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8iezstZPASDx for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A305D3A2A4C for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 00:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.18.156.82] (unknown [46.183.103.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47A927599A; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:12:28 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 09:12:18 +0200
From: Paul <paul@redbarn.org>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
Cc: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, Tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <05371cb4-cc9b-4673-bf43-895e415e2397@pauls-iPhone>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S36LOE9eRn6Q2FLoPyf1yVt+c9ekJ5k0wjGOFDx9kn_pMQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALx6S36F6dVnbxSfNXwQVvbi+mOuedTbn+jLM5-Q87hjxFM+qw@mail.gmail.com> <05A8BF71-5362-484E-A71A-546C052BDFAB@strayalpha.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="60f13152_6b8b4567_134"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/IMmTmPEBCVSzQZ3S0T01UabZiU4>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] UDP options and header-data split (zero copy)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 07:12:37 -0000

     
 

 +1.
 
 

 
>  
> On Jul 15, 2021 at 23:51,  <Tom Herbert (mailto:tom@herbertland.com)>  wrote:
>  
>  
>  
>   >  And there is no way to avoid trailers for non-fragmented packets. Right trailers are only needed in that case. In the case of fragment using both headers and trailers simultaneously is unnecessary complexity that provides no benefit. If just headers are used then the system doesn't need to support trailers for that case and header-data split continues to work as expected. Tom 
>
>