From nobody Fri Jun 11 05:53:02 2021
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E03D3A3688
 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:53:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
 DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
 header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id K0R1Pv5STKXK for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
 Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D353A3685
 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id bp38so8466437lfb.0
 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; 
 h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
 bh=OGOaceyomxWvIpHA3JpO0eXk0k08mSd54+Z37ad/rjA=;
 b=AC2MjpntG5YNBqJdWZhzPcbYNllEFm9pzjW3+FoVFkfDhJnFQ7yRfPIUMe+RUNEelr
 n2w2VDlFL8XfMZ6+00YdQP0ygo41gi+mqAc2XpgcGrvkE4e98mewgYKDPz9HFJYKMzR0
 VGUQM1MoERKllb/5R+s/sijLuv3xIpPxf5ueFoiWZiiSHejgdCiu3Y5ZQrAnXCKCCglX
 WvnOrwXm8w3CX5H8k0tYyz5rT+JBDL8oXsMLx10zvsI0hEzvdl3HG0z2mzMsfTkDiYLp
 dRHmOFXOTLYNgxIbZz5mrOxpBbTMpGCEqRf/v4dXrCLGtMeeyTLlsPZvbOti/mln9xBd
 CWJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
 bh=OGOaceyomxWvIpHA3JpO0eXk0k08mSd54+Z37ad/rjA=;
 b=YNLLUnhKseyY8ihG71YaeFQi1rDyPYBXB2Z0d7eapjIOZ5awjwGkk4FlB4Mxn5qot7
 b79DSlSb9/m8qFqsBcNgyo8gLAs01Aj/+qyvxnA8MJeS8ee8YOH2Vu5To6AaSH1k1C4L
 faAMOIUXGRH8l3V+/Pf3ZPOAvtokm2ILYrdUv1bXPHisPPUf1GeZTi9OpV7biaA2VLOj
 UhV6TKaHKQoqB9JaRNML0B1XEOyZLN47YN6i9E/DC/QoOhciBfwPAVuuMxBRbttxWC6d
 6et9LzGooaE2B/wMVihJLRa5SJgYqvFhVClhMseVtwJ09bGQ8YV/SDXaMmZUGomaO4Ig
 EAqg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5325RGPwinqUWzUK+XY6Bjz0KqYGIYuhSY8m/bGGutU06uBCPy78
 bsctlNFdUMCMPxYJNpxGhpA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxMy6MzsAdtnJOXWIVL21Hu2lu6uA6IaO3Ddw0HUY5IDbiXM3IFQCFhkRYzfwuU5ASKOqb5rw==
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5978:: with SMTP id h24mr2648140lfp.232.1623415969697; 
 Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (178-55-194-130.bb.dnainternet.fi.
 [178.55.194.130])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d22sm710646ljc.55.2021.06.11.05.52.48
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 11 Jun 2021 05:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <E08EFD61-2A81-4098-AFB2-D72E4E7BFFC6@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 15:52:47 +0300
Cc: "De Schepper,
 Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>, 
 TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D648D56A-6096-42A2-A461-DF11F783259D@gmail.com>
References: <4D72E5C0-6EA6-4C90-9CD2-A94201806B22@gmx.de>
 <AM9PR07MB73131643CC45F6C63EA0B824B9369@AM9PR07MB7313.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <E08EFD61-2A81-4098-AFB2-D72E4E7BFFC6@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/J4qufVPuZk9dmpeBHUer67FiioY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Question regarding slide 3 of
 https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/materials/slides-106-tsvwg-sessb-31-tcp-prague-status-of-implementation-and-evaluation-00#page=3
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>,
 <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>,
 <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2021 12:53:01 -0000

> On 11 Jun, 2021, at 1:38 pm, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de> =
wrote:
>=20
> As far as I understand ethernet, a packet is always send at the =
negotiated link rate, and shaper basically control how many =
packets/bytes per unit of time they admit, so the link itself will =
always either be 100% loaded or idle> I guess what I should ask, what do =
you mean with smoothly shaped or what would be a link layer you want to =
differentiate against here?

I think what he means is that switched Ethernet does not aggregate or =
burst packets, and doesn't have a MAC grant delay.  This makes it close =
to an ideal packet delivery system.

 - Jonathan Morton=

