[tsvwg] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-19: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 09 April 2020 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30203A0AC6; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 06:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud@ietf.org, tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>, wes@mti-systems.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.125.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <158643774827.7059.14728691009658122346@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 06:09:08 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/JIm_UVVTvpc-1_pyM4iAbSULQZk>
Subject: [tsvwg] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-19=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 13:09:09 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-19: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document. The document is clear, easy to
read and quite useful (perhaps mixing too many PL protocols though).

Please find below nee non-blocking NIT.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Nice to read about the outcomes of the NEAT project

Regards,

-éric

==NIT ==

-- Section 2 --
Looking for details in " A Packet is the IP header plus the IP payload." is it
worth mentioning the IPv6 extension headers or using "IP headers" (plural form)
?