Re: [tsvwg] feedback and thoughts L4S / SCE

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sat, 28 November 2020 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316623A0A1E for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:24:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G9GDb4VLBrkH for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CD5F3A0A0B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1CD4AB1; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:24:12 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1606580652; bh=HAB/5PDaeOBmvv0AtRWuQjby7a5fcJuT4pnUQgGOVSw=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=J3nvpvyqiGab/ewPVHaEA+Brx0fTb2bkITImLHP/09oqtUwkzqxNm1Q+kQ0Nj6qzv dCEp1mz3rNjw0Ufw9BfGKxNvtTwR4lWR/FcBvml/6hzneLJVUyPER4ZacXGDeMlO76 jWoX+FvFfVZKj+HiuZMM6YwZBYckSpnKe+PGrD2Y=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1940FAF; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:24:12 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:24:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
cc: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, tsvwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <BDB27AE9-0A35-441D-B18F-5CD7C2903AF8@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011281723120.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011201413100.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se> <9B5474B3-4384-4A20-81C3-5251246AA594@gmx.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011221548210.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se> <066C60AF-39A3-41EF-B9E9-938AA1A707F5@gmx.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011281512350.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5A423905-EFD9-4A93-AB46-BACF61FE2D2D@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011281658380.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se> <BDB27AE9-0A35-441D-B18F-5CD7C2903AF8@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/JuLmYb7O_dQ1I-DqYA53FtkIwUc>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] feedback and thoughts L4S / SCE
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 16:24:16 -0000

On Sat, 28 Nov 2020, Jonathan Morton wrote:

> Take a random sampling of CPE devices, and see how many of them use the 
> above - or it might be easier to count the ones that don't.  I'll wait.

My ubiquiti APs come with it, but it's default turned off.

It's not only important of the devices have the capability, it also needs 
to be default turned on so it's actually used (considering most people 
don't change config much).

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se