IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Reminder: WGLC Announcement for draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-08 - 26th November 2010

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 01 December 2010 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF65F28C0EC for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:06:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.213, BAYES_20=-0.74, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01uUN+qFT08D for <tsvwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:06:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471EC28C17A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 07:06:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.150] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oB1F7Umh023477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Dec 2010 08:07:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624080ac91c14ffe58b@[10.20.30.150]>
In-Reply-To: <BB803922-E3CD-4B26-9467-8BB14B259D3F@nokia.com>
References: <4CE573AC.6050708@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <p06240827c9108fb7d7f0@[10.20.30.150]> <4CED3A82.5050708@ericsson.com> <p0624089fc912ec9557a7@[10.20.30.150]> <4CF60F04.60101@ericsson.com> <4CF6252A.2020303@cisco.com> <BB803922-E3CD-4B26-9467-8BB14B259D3F@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 07:07:29 -0800
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: Reminder: WGLC Announcement for draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-08 - 26th November 2010
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:06:46 -0000

At 1:05 PM +0200 12/1/10, Lars Eggert wrote:
>"only some Unix flavors" is severely understating the issue. I just tried MacOS, FreeBSD and Ubuntu Linux, and none of them let user process bind to ports below 1024.

<sigh> Good enough for me. Drop the issue, and let's bring it up separately, if at all.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email