Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-02-20

"Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Wed, 05 February 2020 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E27A120059 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:52:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pt-CAsV0j5kY for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ECAD1200B3 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:52:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 015Eqo8J097772; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:52:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net)
Received: (from ietf@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 015Eqo3A097771; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:52:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ietf)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-Id: <202002051452.015Eqo3A097771@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <88fce1c5-0922-2d46-8d38-ab63b8c5d039@mti-systems.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 06:52:50 -0800 (PST)
CC: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/KtlpDw7ictKxxYPAB9FROLSdCGo>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Fwd: Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-02-20
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2020 14:52:53 -0000

> In order to improve availability for the ADs and some others, would it 
> be a large problem for anyone planning to participate if the time for 
> this moves to one hour earlier?

The meeting is presently scheduled for 10am America/New_York, moving
that to 9am America/New_York would make it 6am for me on the west
coast, I already pushed back lightly on that in the original call
for meeting, but as I said there and shall say again here, I can
make that, but I may not be very coherent.

Regards,
Rod Grimes

> 
> 
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) WG Virtual Meeting: 
> 2020-02-20
> Date: 	Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:01:42 -0800
> From: 	IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> To: 	IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> CC: 	tsvwg@ietf.org
> 
> 
> 
> The Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) Working Group will hold
> a virtual interim meeting on 2020-02-20 from 10:00 to 12:00 
> America/New_York.
> 
> Agenda:
> 1. Agenda bashing (chairs - 5 min)
> 2. Update on status and near-term plans for the set of L4S drafts (Bob? 
> - 5 min)
> - Chair request: Think about adding an explicit "Open Issues / Future 
> Work" type of section in the architecture draft to consolidate a list of 
> things still being worked in the context of TCP Prague and/or caveats 
> and unknowns people should be aware of when deploying this Experimental 
> work.
> 3. Update on L4S & TCP Prague implementation, test, evaluation 
> (Greg/Bob/Koen? - 15 min)
> 4. L4S Issues List Discussion (goal is to see if we can agree on what 
> more needs to be done on each issue to suffice for 
> Experimental/Informational RFCs):
> 4.1 Discuss status on (Bob - ~30 min):
> #16 on classic ECN interaction
> #21 CE codepoint semantics (closely related to #16)
> #20 ECT(1) codepoint usage
> 4.2 Discuss plans forward to address (Bob - ~15 min):
> #26 on admission control
> #27 on terminology
> #22 on deployment feasibility
> #24 on evaluation & testing results
> 4.3 (We will try to handle the issues below by mailing list prior to the 
> meeting)
> If needed, discuss close-out of (~15 min):
> #25 on IPR
> #18 on loss detection in time-units
> #23 on implementation status
> #19 on the single codepoint
> #17 on FQ interaction 5. SCE Update (Morton/Heist/etc. - ~30 min)
> 
> 
> Information about remote participation:
> Remote participation information will be obtained at the time of 
> approval. Plan to use IETF WebEx.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce