Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4960 (2592)

[Gorry Fairhurst <[e-mail]>]

Michael,

These seem to be straightforward corrections. Please propose some 
corrections in the form below, and we can make sure the RFC-Ed notes these.

---
OLD:
xxx
NEW:
xxx

---

Gorry

On 29/10/2010 16:19, Michael Tüxen wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> we should possibly fix the wording also in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-chunk-flags-02
> during AUTH48.
>
> TSVWG chairs: Is that possible?
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>
> On Oct 29, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Randy Stewart wrote:
>
>> Dear RFC Editor:
>>
>> The Errata is correct.. Tom and I discussed this on the list
>> and I agree with it. We obviously made a cut-and paste typo.. since
>> chunk types are different than parameter types ;-)
>>
>> Best Wishes
>>
>> Randall Stewart
>> On Oct 29, 2010, at 6:35 AM, RFC Errata System wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4960,
>>> "Stream Control Transmission Protocol".
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> You may review the report below and at:
>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4960&eid=2592
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Type: Editorial
>>> Reported by: tom petch<[e-mail]>
>>>
>>> Section: 14.1
>>>
>>> Original Text
>>> -------------
>>> 14.1.  IETF-Defined Chunk Extension
>>>
>>>   The assignment of new chunk parameter type codes is done through an
>>>   IETF Consensus action, as defined in [RFC2434].  Documentation of the
>>>   chunk parameter MUST contain the following information:
>>>
>>>
>>> Corrected Text
>>> --------------
>>> 14.1.  IETF-Defined Chunk Extension
>>>
>>>   The assignment of new chunk type codes is done through an
>>> IETF Consensus action, as defined in [RFC2434].  Documentation of the
>>> chunk type MUST contain the following information:
>>>
>>>
>>> Notes
>>> -----
>>> The OLD text relates to parameter types, and not chunk types, and already appears, correctly, in section 14.2.  Section 14.1 is about chunk types,as the NEW text says.
>>>
>>> Instructions:
>>> -------------
>>> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
>>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> RFC4960 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-2960bis-05)
>>> --------------------------------------
>>> Title               : Stream Control Transmission Protocol
>>> Publication Date    : September 2007
>>> Author(s)           : R. Stewart, Ed.
>>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>>> Source              : Transport Area Working Group
>>> Area                : Transport
>>> Stream              : IETF
>>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>>>
>>
>> -----
>> Randall Stewart
>> [e-mail]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>