[tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 16 November 2020 18:31 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE1C03A1390 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:31:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id apfFsD5_LCBs for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com (mail-qv1-xf31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 789DC3A138C for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:31:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id ec16so9273355qvb.0 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:31:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=AXRF1X92EiZHsrR75lmUjnSPSit99GVaAlhp8HTek3k=; b=1TQzwPlKit4EYmdx+ujKGhR7CuvNh7mJrVMDOCuqYzICD2+bq8tYEhzEwLmcbHTebL CdvwOetkGhK9+NRyHxdpKNam6phfbUKetLM/uQDLmvM/OrEulZuFwaRhYvllEQQtof7b Osz4U7cNkSe2I1ooobCZgM7Fmnxv4f2UwSmgRvIaRfB4uF+QBvGZSBaWEf+XCTjVhsCJ Np+A2M02G5EHAmeklqFgqBg1zZVJw0e5tv6Gqmc7qDBRmNkDobtfXzZ/XgapsuZGkarB Q1CQS/ikN3kTlNk++9Z7CHPOkjn6fFhAr+12Kcg6BuMAAeul9pP5ub0uRdiwmbEGSjxL BdLg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=AXRF1X92EiZHsrR75lmUjnSPSit99GVaAlhp8HTek3k=; b=cnptaqBIVOMdkq7Q7Jc7bdGg958dhwzi7ewH18dRv9wPXhKJC5k966gckcSRabYZDz Q+cGMsKLxJWkSJXwRaOlApXdRqcLqUqkownKCVem/RDd9FFaIol5p94NLH9tbtjHkN0F w10S74W7ESJkcpc+fBhVBOjxZtL66VRJdaSv2OZg5LO6sYyvUJF0GchwH5v+mz47eHvB VAaj9yXrFlK6Bg3vljSwRLo90VBHhGHzdMW2YsXWNpWNpdQjnFo8T3pw9ZQOf7+Dr//e /7pmtLMglcubEjBaASQf95ibqExCQeBeW9qi8Wm1ptiP9shSWYkaljrjuIyLk4g/1A2/ cB2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oQY0FOFZ1CA/Tlmpj7xfrnYE/BjPxsJsl0eyK/Mqubb/SWlGk ajqOrlzOGmb2rQVRuEe4ZqoLICjzX29S40CJ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqcf6LdHlx/TS+O1SSqveaMiyuWMzC1V0wg1IdyvM8QjOi2rgpCNgqy56RpxVdD+JjN3GgHg==
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:5043:: with SMTP id m3mr13784851qvq.45.1605551493086; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:31:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.14] (cpe-174-102-117-3.columbus.res.rr.com. [174.102.117.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm12515917qtq.91.2020.11.16.10.31.32 for <tsvwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:31:32 -0800 (PST)
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <b6bc81f5-e1f2-e226-1612-7f1070290bbd@mti-systems.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:31:31 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/LOKLDzJf3i7BHXR6uMhBYH83E6M>
Subject: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:31:38 -0000
In today's meeting, it was mentioned that the L4S operational guidance draft is part of the "safety case" for advancing other L4S drafts. It's not as mature as the other docs yet (e.g. there are several"TODO" portions), but we want to understand if people think it's going in the right direction and will be suitable for this purpose as it's sketched, or what else should be added/changed/etc. This is on the agenda for Wednesday's meeting. So, if you have bandwidth, please check out the L4S operational guidance draft prior to the Wednesday meeting, so that we can get a better sense of how to proceed: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-tsvwg-l4sops/
- [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Ruediger.Geib
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Holland, Jake
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Pete Heist
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Holland, Jake
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Sebastian Moeller
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Holland, Jake
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tsvwg] L4S operational guidance draft Sebastian Moeller