IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Requesting TSVWG adoption of SCE draft-morton-tsvwg-sce

Bob Briscoe <in@bobbriscoe.net> Sun, 17 November 2019 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <in@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876171201EF; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 15:30:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FCTNzxH4sc13; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 15:30:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server.dnsblock1.com (server.dnsblock1.com [85.13.236.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AF19120144; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 15:30:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=v8abMjcQjykJA9W/zgbrV/Edcewzg/CA6xXA07DLNX0=; b=bEcA1SvfTI3mpYNnepePeuntOq VF7To72+X96zBeIZnm3h4CzPwzthycgNP5kCs0jqEkmbsi6bLTOOe6lpBhZFNvY0zhAWS6+c+IhG1 YhVgXu3pYVkUIadlgNi88Hd4ZTiAnut8l2MJULA9X8Feh3/hZ7yjos+Fv0WTQjOXsloCXzO8luLLR 3IQhBVM1Dmlh4ePF/T/fgMeXpxOmi9pEy1q4adc4+H8SXM9amiPbV5ePoYvLt5J94CRoBbE9Mhnoj JehFqPPm46Om3acSkVnjzxWzC+vJCwWUpCJWyile5PDmSopJU0naeDkNYqjoP5wPaGc8rjVCcu4Uq p6EkBnUQ==;
Received: from [182.55.86.154] (port=55352 helo=[192.168.0.142]) by server.dnsblock1.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <in@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1iWU0B-00034k-8m; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 23:30:43 +0000
To: "tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org" <tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <201911141350.xAEDo99J048928@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, tsvwg@ietf.org
From: Bob Briscoe <in@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Remindit: Mon Nov 18 2019 08:00:00 GMT+0800 (+08)
Message-ID: <39d0435d-e22b-7b4b-bba7-3988a67aba76@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:30:40 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201911141350.xAEDo99J048928@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.dnsblock1.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.dnsblock1.com: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: server.dnsblock1.com: in@bobbriscoe.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/LSrGVecIUv7mUD0ZqyZHnxwpnEI>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Requesting TSVWG adoption of SCE draft-morton-tsvwg-sce
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 23:30:48 -0000

tsvwg Chairs,


On 14/11/2019 21:50, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> The TSVWG chairs have provided the following guidelines for this adoption request:
[snip]
> (2) Coexistence of the L4S and SCE experiments is a concern that will need to be addressed by the WG if the SCE draft is adopted, and hence is in scope for discussion of this adoption request
> ..  In particular, absence of a coexistence plan (e.g., to deal with the different uses of the ECT(1) codepoint by L4S and SCE) is not an automatic barrier to WG adoption of the SCE draft.
Could the chairs give clarity on whether Rod's statement above came from 
the them please? And if it did, what the chairs thinking was in saying 
that. It seems rather an odd thing for chairs of an IETF WG to say about 
a codepoint in the IP header, when the prime role of the IETF is 
interoperability and coexistence.



Bob


-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email