[tsvwg] NQB - which DSCP to recommend?

"Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com> Fri, 15 November 2019 00:58 UTC

Return-Path: <David.Black@dell.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D5512008C for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:58:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dell.com header.b=NdU2zuS6; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dell.onmicrosoft.com header.b=RQY7+4LI
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b0WsdBZUEGmM for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00154904.pphosted.com (mx0b-00154904.pphosted.com [148.163.137.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1053E120059 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 16:58:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0170398.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00154904.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xAF0t8Ck000606 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:58:08 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dell.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : content-type : mime-version; s=smtpout1; bh=EHpZ6FNE3lqrqkI0vy4caZCyEQu1g1BlZk9mHbkNZc4=; b=NdU2zuS6J1kpZCOvrz+alGR9cDTDcmq2RKs1MIf0UVZLVkkNh7TVJoVlmfS6r5JEfOug CIuY5CKg5EcDAJtcXmISSybQakR1cSoSivJVWdKg32GbVpTdh/CJxwEh4+JJ6Zi8tPaK jmXiu+64N2g+fO7fQ0Gy3jc9yDZl+8cW7AhSSb3+94Q9uN3kQ0AjmigTq11/NruXduhE OitN2reAz6gcdhfwdZzb9/5lZbMLQB0kouAvKXEHs8aTOViWSxxEZeNLwF51T/v3Qn17 4ZXXVZdLQxmoL74KvYOwWaJslIZY0b19kc+1mBYoXb1ScdEbmfrWYkK+U8KMcSDzMvBL 7w==
Received: from mx0a-00154901.pphosted.com (mx0b-00154901.pphosted.com [67.231.157.37]) by mx0b-00154904.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w9ck116uy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:58:08 -0500
Received: from pps.filterd (m0089484.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00154901.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xAF0w51P140802 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:58:07 -0500
Received: from nam03-dm3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam03lp2059.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.41.59]) by mx0b-00154901.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2w91ur0mq4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:58:07 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=mI6sY2kuHC3LlSpclHVCDbdolnFAoi7OR4KLZAWA+s17yoaTT97F7nZY1sjBYsjHLWBCVwKBs2MiUE7CoPOXimu3W44m4JYenkbOFOwiIxuR1Z9c6byoMZRWqJTXrA97V85ZL1sr0FBcLWWzAqnzifD9UUzSZ6AU4Rt7DaocN8+dTn/7s4giPhZLFoL0ud2dJMIeQpuD1mMC+XKx+1qCx65fe3jtbqml4Vyb6IhaIuHnXb8O7m5IK+xkGHz6CaJVp4wJQbslr+iFGwBD3yfssPaTJIGRhl04++hPCFEvN5qfwmrrsd4Pc9kAnBWOEFGhrFMYhuVz+AUkzz6bitzJuQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EHpZ6FNE3lqrqkI0vy4caZCyEQu1g1BlZk9mHbkNZc4=; b=kun162IuwbVwL+mMqEdvIKSFGyOQzbHAqn7squaaDzN6bTxwcDoC+pYzFRB8lvu/P2YiexGCC5PLOrImtBl0X9490XNpf/F0P1fNEk8UAcTSw2SagpHPTNkBa3vhaLlI8QFzi4PJfReVMf6tyQwjO9PSplucLZ1LZVXdEqhXHbLQlSAKb+WTSw56ygVb8KYqpsQerpY+4SP3sVXHYsCqY6PufBPkTjvSTWd8yJH/SE00XOEgUy1Uso+dDNUGdKd8r2DlCq/nyiNO1VCgF8GFzCtjqOXuSwvx+Xr5qlzutHFX0XwWyw+3Jg07+edNXcv/xi4tSRZ7+lJ4+wgpmffhWQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dell.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=dell.com; dkim=pass header.d=dell.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Dell.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-Dell-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=EHpZ6FNE3lqrqkI0vy4caZCyEQu1g1BlZk9mHbkNZc4=; b=RQY7+4LIIVudMstlJIL1NS6yv0HGUIAQD2L2cke8CG7CIJYv+DXHPyx6YFWCJH33on/0dI+vf8qhuPgFn+HYiPK7LfsC1YKg2535bSL0GfpBXqYUotu6NXqNMQ5YlvDol+FlwBgLoCPToQZPLKjKWeHG34cs44VteoM/RQfcTf8=
Received: from MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (10.186.145.137) by MN2PR19MB2989.namprd19.prod.outlook.com (20.179.80.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2430.25; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:58:06 +0000
Received: from MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8893:d435:ce32:3594]) by MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::8893:d435:ce32:3594%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2430.027; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:58:06 +0000
From: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: NQB - which DSCP to recommend?
Thread-Index: AdWbT7q4ff1pYakkSdOAEfQFvOmn0w==
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:58:05 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR19MB404507EBF1C41E72A7930F0F83700@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_17cb76b2-10b8-4fe1-93d4-2202842406cd_Enabled=True; MSIP_Label_17cb76b2-10b8-4fe1-93d4-2202842406cd_SiteId=945c199a-83a2-4e80-9f8c-5a91be5752dd; MSIP_Label_17cb76b2-10b8-4fe1-93d4-2202842406cd_Owner=david.black@emc.com; MSIP_Label_17cb76b2-10b8-4fe1-93d4-2202842406cd_SetDate=2019-11-15T00:58:04.3585549Z; MSIP_Label_17cb76b2-10b8-4fe1-93d4-2202842406cd_Name=External Public; MSIP_Label_17cb76b2-10b8-4fe1-93d4-2202842406cd_Application=Microsoft Azure Information Protection; MSIP_Label_17cb76b2-10b8-4fe1-93d4-2202842406cd_Extended_MSFT_Method=Manual; aiplabel=External Public
x-originating-ip: [143.166.255.114]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2431685d-0058-4491-9c3d-08d76966dff5
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR19MB2989:
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR19MB29892DA26B57DB596BCD682183700@MN2PR19MB2989.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
x-exotenant: 2khUwGVqB6N9v58KS13ncyUmMJd8q4
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 02229A4115
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(366004)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(7502003)(189003)(199004)(26005)(1730700003)(14454004)(5640700003)(5660300002)(478600001)(790700001)(6436002)(52536014)(4744005)(236005)(66476007)(107886003)(4326008)(66556008)(6116002)(3846002)(9686003)(6306002)(66946007)(64756008)(66446008)(54896002)(2501003)(76116006)(55016002)(256004)(81156014)(71200400001)(486006)(8676002)(99286004)(25786009)(8936002)(66066001)(476003)(81166006)(74316002)(186003)(2351001)(7696005)(71190400001)(86362001)(6506007)(7736002)(2906002)(316002)(33656002)(102836004)(6916009)(786003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR19MB2989; H:MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: dell.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: v/nUN+3/u6sLU7s6diEalnln9PDOKeKVEGT3AzgLhyCs7XItApUHrtEyxagWTBWKU6WXY83mPCzPnAkrfLZ06EdCh9fOzrJdbh2Tgl8hKpU6QZ7BmhXEEjvH48Lq8klfX7sgOB9HGe2FzgTOZoxaCmlCByBLLanwc1dAeEW/gQ8zodlOEBAtHItPhvOhGkDu0k1LxYrr1xMnZ4EFHLwumq7Iz8W15nwHNka5bTB7ifwHqnBZHuGcjWzDlnaQQwUH6HvDqCGEksCjmBO7KuvKQDduqK5IR73O/fepLwSUqGyG5reFyPHPP9CkBQeSqs2L42v45OP8Lu7JG3bRxlX3feOb0LIRXe9KgdYmtqVBAwdyP+UMJE6oUVHKeXdudc7kj7FHxPPwSi8/N37k2r7u91NkWOxuOF53uXzgp6MHTX/tT9TJ2S3PpFyhS8B5vOxN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR19MB404507EBF1C41E72A7930F0F83700MN2PR19MB4045namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Dell.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2431685d-0058-4491-9c3d-08d76966dff5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 15 Nov 2019 00:58:05.9169 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 945c199a-83a2-4e80-9f8c-5a91be5752dd
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: NOtkzTs2JzMA89uH/iz7v6U/pvBsBbD6IFLxcvDhJco79Bp8Nu4y1MhUYA7Xd72E24C5wG8oIqDwpEmf3WAk9w==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR19MB2989
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-11-14_07:2019-11-14,2019-11-14 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=489 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1911150004
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=484 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1911150003
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/LqhSkF-yOvpY1vTa6l-p73mQdiM>
Subject: [tsvwg] NQB - which DSCP to recommend?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 00:58:12 -0000

Lurking in the lengthy discussion about NQB and existing WiFi is a topic that needs broader WG attention, please.   Sebastian wrote:



> IMHO the upshot of this should be to

>

> a)  propose a DSCP for the NQB PHB that maps into AC_BE

The general topic is which DSCP should be the recommended DSCP for the  NQB PHB.  The NQB draft proposes 0x2A, but the WG may choose to select a different DSCP for this purpose.

Ok, please discuss ...

Thanks, --David
----------------------------------------------------------------
David L. Black, Senior Distinguished Engineer
Dell EMC, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA  01748
+1 (774) 350-9323 New    Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754
David.Black@dell.com<mailto:David.Black@dell.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------