Re: [tsvwg] [saag] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt

David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 November 2019 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33888120025; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:10:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aPP83oiNfvaz; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:10:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com (mail-lj1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9848E12008F; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:10:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id r7so15017589ljg.2; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 14:10:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1wHlvxPUraVXaiYgJnudSvaGhOYUzSvgFCVMeEJpjLU=; b=JtqYKLjjNDLmvBpaLV4SiU64mVY+Th3rge66At3Eh/mPGDWMECv/n2J/85BSju5Vi9 2Gj0M4XMMMavAX4JN9f0QOkp3ACv5xg2GvqFrWq8NmU6EpRN8wtls3nG8706c/VwhagU 46tP521ILM13zY/Fuz5LKCP9IuRH+hFV1j6sCmgt/nC6NoDrYnGGC2wCgxI9gBJSgasr ZEToQcIrM3qO5h0X4F35FGagzIZOukgRgWPjTvjSWL5/zVZ0rY8+gSkevrmtBQxeBTHf JvHUW/SXDL+l1b4tl/yA7WETTCawTZzQSDwiGWq6MNT84pgn7evyDFlSiFtTtwT2OwCh n8ug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1wHlvxPUraVXaiYgJnudSvaGhOYUzSvgFCVMeEJpjLU=; b=Kfp31npWTa8kub3gpix6e0avx0i32NEHvcMnMLNnY15GOMkydDx5MKRcI+jUMHKVIE Cd8RVkcWs97uk4Ut5M2AcWCdLptx0s1V/HMP1VSf14ERlMVPI7e6ViluQ3P1Gu93Ujxv 2GavqgC84uXz048GY7Nlq2jkGEjbNPmsOc6UjORX5qVtYU+a1jpcrpet8gAWnW/xKyBL +waySM+2yhOk8rmqtaylkVsBkJsFoQikGc0GIT5bPVNaFJa9R9sVNtipDkJTf/W7uw1m AQCpZVnzVYv7r0gCN2TEc3mG28P9e2obzBob2WHFVvQ0YnVe+IMMsMZc1U4n9C9PRMFZ NVcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXWIodKbrwJoWegIoopEw4dF2VNMjk9wMVHGrQFdXI3mnGPkBo0 Wp98AI/KPQd+odZePQtfNa4j5O8DFlz8CK7xms0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwGvs/Sjdro0ldR6H0XknwLNBRngUZYRq1LTgkhncS35xEo262LlL2KjUFvu3x62oz92aYBPnKszV25k53PO2c=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9016:: with SMTP id h22mr16347603ljg.137.1572991821653; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 14:10:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <67CE4313-A4C2-4CC7-972E-CB465D47B7FE@ericsson.com> <998B7C3E-54D8-40AC-BF91-901390CF70C5@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <998B7C3E-54D8-40AC-BF91-901390CF70C5@strayalpha.com>
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:10:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+5rvaXgEGZ7_V4pRdmBss7Hf1XmaGbiXGZceQu9hjjRTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c3abaf0596a0b256"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/Lr3sf4Sx2lKld1nI6Y1NTxc5M_E>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [saag] Comments on draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt-08.txt
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 22:10:26 -0000

I also oppose publication of draft-ietf-tsvwg-transport-encrypt. This
document discourages transport header encryption and publishing it could
harm future protocol development.

David

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 1:04 PM Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On Nov 5, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind <mirja.kuehlewind=
> 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > What I’m hearing is that 2-3 people think this is not aligned but don’t
> actually say why exactly they think that
>
> That’s not what we’re saying. We gave reasons.
>
> Joe
>