Re: [tsvwg] Review of DPLPMTUD draft
"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Mon, 22 April 2024 23:57 UTC
Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD23C1C410F; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ODkKgzqs-1ir; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:57:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D5F1C19ECB9; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A8171FA6DA; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:57:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=hCtXDlxNg1QfsgmkfG5r1kKLY8ZJWYAG tIYJl/i/VJ0=; b=hCoUBtmRRfvKXF/STVSCjqVinUE4cnUqKJpidko5ZGxF8LvR V6Y2idVKpBcwjvpG5UonUM8lRs6G0ugM7ewOdt1mi5ToXH6QZ+XE1ubzVUK+J49e iLR6IUKmmITm7G87mPVL0lwsYG0CmB1m/2R9AD/w8ePIcjc07V4o5arLcMs=
Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728EA1FA6D9; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:57:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-ej1-f41.google.com (unknown [209.85.218.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2CA61FA6D8; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:57:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-ej1-f41.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a52aa665747so605015266b.2; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXWDPoCdMaPxok6AyFOXiZZljpBjjHPKpnd4xxSynwdcQU+zGDOkJTdQ/Q5/NBRaAfO9A4htRslBG5+02D3Vw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxbYNa4m0KNDLjIvAGSkuszRVZ6tccEisVhE89/LET8u/ftHKmJ hr94SUw3Tyz0WovT1j4rsVrJQv/NsX5JfeIEd+Tc3cqVTVzv1mfG06lyok8OYOshwjvULFR/5S2 4VvBLdFHTjvTTAd0WIxLCgT1FwUE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFmPGcgwb3MCejYIlEbtzGWF1XEL8EeryMmQWWQzt4SUbRLmDF81ITz2FR35bipSpSsHLV8L0HqJnF0aUehewM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5045:b0:a47:3312:b32a with SMTP id e5-20020a170906504500b00a473312b32amr6345801ejk.58.1713830270000; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4esxQdMe_U_stQRNQc0AWAiTsYJxu1ApZi-HCvYePView+6g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxQdMe_U_stQRNQc0AWAiTsYJxu1ApZi-HCvYePView+6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 16:57:38 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VG7W9Qwts48g+Sbxo_BE4KS4iBJ7MqF3RJbuC-hio1YGA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VG7W9Qwts48g+Sbxo_BE4KS4iBJ7MqF3RJbuC-hio1YGA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud.all@ietf.org, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000072f2a90616b8342b"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 208DAB7E-0104-11EF-B90D-78DCEB2EC81B-06080547!pb-smtp1.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/LzLHehuizbglQUoC1auA9jJPYwI>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Review of DPLPMTUD draft
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 23:57:57 -0000
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 4:40 PM Martin Duke wrote: > I have read this draft and believe it is ready for the AD, modulo the > status of the udp-options draft it depends on. > +1. I reviewed the draft previously and came to the same conclusion, and there have been no changes since my previous review. Mike Heard >
- [tsvwg] Review of DPLPMTUD draft Martin Duke
- Re: [tsvwg] Review of DPLPMTUD draft C. M. Heard