Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Sun, 12 May 2019 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0445312011F for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 May 2019 16:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IVWU9sxkMCTP for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 May 2019 16:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72e.google.com (mail-qk1-x72e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A74312013E for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 May 2019 16:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72e.google.com with SMTP id w20so6919746qka.7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 May 2019 16:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5LzVS5wu9T8AFVBcRVVDSYqb55nuuBCHc40PKREbb50=; b=n/Ph8Mv3kNpER4TOMrT1IKcRUSkSER8FZy0kp7D/mOuMaO/mIK8p1W9+7DGmjaAHtc N6Ky8Mm/1Py+Wrsjh4JLbT0LpCUU/iKVjqrzM6ih8w7FkNw9BQbuMA/X8Ks4p64PjWiV 4DENWrVxmnqPrLZD/npM993iuV13tO1pqkQS2dHDqFQ5HW+thsG0Y67Xb0KuykQ+GcNO J/LC+BcEVdwuzJrFpDCWojWjfYJFuny+zQWqX3hCVn3y1Dwd/cB9IW7mbh+KdYjQD/Ms dLBJBN0u0xiz+boLxGIMY7JH2MWNnUjr1pqW/BukqZZRzSouN3czWzC03beeO9B0cJfp PlCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5LzVS5wu9T8AFVBcRVVDSYqb55nuuBCHc40PKREbb50=; b=IHxMgr7Ut4JHXz50OhwYOUTq8XPcV88YFAm9zOpqOFi6rmXHkIN2JtIBzMLhky8LYv 3G0WhQIfiTUKbtvf1E5GtFd9xQ6lo0wya+AYHiNYq2kINrwBI3IIzyp+CbJnmcJ4IevR 8JIQ1HVTC71sj7WdSM8ZQPXliq1Lb5Ky1D3dR17emfXxa3C784PF3HuDYJCSSQgYyBDU zNWSHWMzymcpfGuclcjQa5vFp7P2PjIyEElmeNo5rPAwvKWZCeNyxGf3QdGdouFhB+rB jA5ye6qgR9C/z3rpHHFU/3SjiujaUuzYLWgNSlldxAc93ik1tLbddMMiNT0Zw8VVyxAs CWQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWaKXWEbXIULnWCQUaqD0OvkUys8sGov//Ix+I30+cHE/t+X35s hlgErtJDM0xbjRw8qPDZ1fvooA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwrSHnTF7TEZ7Cxy+ZOFap+8Egx86QDyvYv1XCAOPH0DUCfE7xvZGxiEfDnfA7w+t/OsWhx5A==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f117:: with SMTP id k23mr18667531qkg.344.1557702128363; Sun, 12 May 2019 16:02:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.100.13] (c-73-186-137-119.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.186.137.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y14sm7359561qth.48.2019.05.12.16.02.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 May 2019 16:02:06 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-9DAC453E-E879-4CE8-8AF0-640141210A33"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16F155)
In-Reply-To: <617F1DC0-E891-4548-8BD0-56054ED64E6E@bogus.com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 19:02:05 -0400
Cc: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <FBD3299A-7602-4A75-BCDA-3BFF8F308937@fugue.com>
References: <CAA93jw7eZ0Rfvc+tUKx0mG_Bdxqos-DTBn=ojYJCM0UCh38ScA@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB25221DA057496B1A89FD391B95390@HE1PR0701MB2522.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAA93jw4V6328H2awWmSnhJnKgKASqy-9yXY=ke3JgcMxLiRY2A@mail.gmail.com> <C302B225-7806-4D6D-9ECE-FA3EFD6D7CA4@strayalpha.com> <4C8193B9-586C-4ED9-B01E-6BA37071600A@fugue.com> <617F1DC0-E891-4548-8BD0-56054ED64E6E@bogus.com>
To: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/MCmAe-h2D9Z5Ibyekz9bO6yKSQQ>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] travel funds for ietf for the next SCE talk?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 23:02:13 -0000

This is the precise distinction I was making. I didn’t pay. Someone paid, but not me. It’s amazing that you were willing to make it work out of pocket, but that’s just not scalable. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 12, 2019, at 6:27 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On May 10, 2019, at 07:00, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On May 10, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
>>> The only  people who get a fully free ride that I know of are the IEEE Comsoc Board. 
>> 
>> Hm.  I’ve never paid to attend IETF.  Granted, this is not because IETF comped me, but because I was fortunate enough to have an employer who could afford to send me at no cost to me.
>> 
>> This model unfortunately doesn’t work for open source developers who are not on the payroll of a company with deep pockets.
>> 
> 
> That's an odd definition of having never paid.  At the point of registration, you either provided a credit card or requested an invoice. The nominal cost of your involvement in the IETF borne on the part of you or your employer(s) is no doubt considerable, especially during your term on the IESG when the time commitment was also considerable..  
> 
> For most  of the 4 years I spent on the IESG I paid the costs of attending out of my own pocket. I did that, because it was what i signed up for, because it needed to get done and because I believed there was value in the work being done in the operations and management area.  Back as an individual contributor I come when I have something to do and some way to pay for it otherwise I wouldn't be there.
> 
> joel
>