[tsvwg] Re: support last call for User Ports for Experiments
"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Mon, 05 August 2024 15:37 UTC
Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3911C180B4A for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.806
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.806 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZojGh3j_bdc8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A8C5C180B43 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 08:37:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084F7357EB for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 11:37:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:cc:content-type; s=sasl; bh=4Gf8t4Q6OrjAOP5MXRzxVhg+Q43wH34a ofPdhXehHNY=; b=ZO8kaKAQWjb2+WXkUPDapGdya/1aQPQxT9wj5+nmtRILN6q+ L2KeKevRpdR6Hcw4osR6twoWi/qzH6qxWtgwDrAroq3DSiQ9tYvb+i9ha7QwoKlO 4naXGKDzqXA9j9ljXEKMjxHulp2Hj4WbtEdhmNbQJCSCTkgIpfwL9Eacqls=
Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F402A357EA for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 11:37:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-ej1-f51.google.com (unknown [209.85.218.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D0A6357E9 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2024 11:37:53 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-ej1-f51.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a7a9cf7d3f3so1303754666b.1 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 08:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzfddE5EV8EgLE5gSbMatVHRXNPburTWQbWayKenOBzLXU4jrS+ GpWpLs+ZowQNeyR96sAsumM2AUECaQkoaA3fxsn+9fRKlqVtOdKZtjLKUTaGIOxWENKydewMLIs y8aTD9HakaejXAsQI/zQwGOS8K7E=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGeqvBtbq3srb/9VuXHF6/w/nJqrJbhC7jwTnI2tE/q/ITLkcmU3Vi70Aa5nnfPNIMdcGV3qQimBwmwWcUREe0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7e9e:b0:a7a:8cfb:655b with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a7dc516085cmr731469066b.64.1722872272253; Mon, 05 Aug 2024 08:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <06f2434e-ed48-4b5f-8623-a567ebae9cee@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <06f2434e-ed48-4b5f-8623-a567ebae9cee@mti-systems.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2024 08:37:42 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VE37jnTd2sbMei0q8X+Sxu6e9mW+D5dvY2hyv-H4giGVw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VE37jnTd2sbMei0q8X+Sxu6e9mW+D5dvY2hyv-H4giGVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c80a37061ef17537"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AE08BF50-5340-11EF-9C06-2BAEEB2EC81B-06080547!pb-smtp1.pobox.com
Message-ID-Hash: WBWRVFK6FQETAH3M7HXVXRXN6NKAT2SN
X-Message-ID-Hash: WBWRVFK6FQETAH3M7HXVXRXN6NKAT2SN
X-MailFrom: heard@pobox.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Re: support last call for User Ports for Experiments
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/NQkhNrvEgt7KP8v74QBf68vDEnQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>
On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 7:05 AM Wesley Eddy wrote: > In the last meetings, the chairs asked for inputs on next steps for > draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp (User Ports for Experiments). > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp/ > > I've read this. It is ready for working group last call, in my > opinion. It seems useful to me to progress this, based on experiences > serving as an IANA ports reviewer. I think it would likely make some of > our responses to port applicants simpler, as well as give those > applicants a clear direction forward, in cases where it makes sense. > I'll add my voice in support of publication. I do see a typo in the last paragraph of the introduction: Old This document reserves user ports experimentation New This document reserves user ports for experimentation MIke Heard
- [tsvwg] support last call for User Ports for Expe… Wesley Eddy
- [tsvwg] Re: support last call for User Ports for … C. M. Heard
- [tsvwg] Re: support last call for User Ports for … Scharf, Michael