Re: [tsvwg] feedback and thoughts L4S / SCE

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sat, 28 November 2020 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3983A0997 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:00:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HoBa92j2zvGP for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:00:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B1BE3A098E for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 08:00:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 49374B1; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:00:04 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1606579204; bh=JIIVTz3rCNa5n7T8m2VBXvUugwH5mTgy+hR0Zdig+7c=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CP61XAccNGqcBP8nviV1Jl2hUhcMz+d2gV9Bw8SIGxsAx4p1nBYuFwNkpmN3V7XVn vePw4IHKYNPFLEzMkd+o8SiwKpHag19wKWJGRXgIjqoe3kEBlKOze4Y1qcCsr/qlM/ xYPO+nQG4yNcG6TfBlPWs4aa0mOJthvjXJdoTn7Q=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456D2AF; Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:00:04 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 17:00:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
cc: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, tsvwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5A423905-EFD9-4A93-AB46-BACF61FE2D2D@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011281658380.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011201413100.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se> <9B5474B3-4384-4A20-81C3-5251246AA594@gmx.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011221548210.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se> <066C60AF-39A3-41EF-B9E9-938AA1A707F5@gmx.de> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2011281512350.26384@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5A423905-EFD9-4A93-AB46-BACF61FE2D2D@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/NeU6CmRWzX-HDkkewZ2CTYnGwFA>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] feedback and thoughts L4S / SCE
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2020 16:00:10 -0000

On Sat, 28 Nov 2020, Jonathan Morton wrote:

> At this point, any claim that fq_codel is not widely deployed in 
> relevant contexts is laughable.

What's your definition on "widely deployed"?

How many percent of customer access lines and wifi access hops do you 
believe has fq_codel (or fq anything) enabled on them?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se