IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Review comments on a careful read of the L4S ID (25)

Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net> Sun, 09 May 2021 20:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D8F3A1F00 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 May 2021 13:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.774
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.774 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mBcJjGRGWIEx for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 9 May 2021 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk (mail-ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk [185.185.85.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 990DA3A1EFF for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 9 May 2021 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Q6y+ZycTZKZ+jmSJcDPsybWTM8LqDiYnYR5N91B3y+E=; b=Xvejh7oblXF6O8L+SghtPzu8CU eraIe5rkRd91kl85maeloOkG2f2h3MRWwryJX5YK5auwdvE/Sz7Mn4FeJnytt09fJqmSe2tNjzcgw 8oY+zl5dte3uRQxTu6JKPCwttjEX8uXwGm9j1ewzqAam5FMwv4f4hvRlnkbRnwtAH1EDFtbKg1RhY ChLLb/1yttKK0Yq+yZMwi5pKA/4UcO3ahf87JrSkx7N9anmqiWWrDy4CrauLP+F7jN+BNxY9F1EyI MVNdZHhcprFhOTbIJ9QnZJSDQ48QJkFIyUdOzI4MyGOboCA9YsSKw/JHuxjhfaoAEmlO/qXN104+P wiIS0kMQ==;
Received: from 67.153.238.178.in-addr.arpa ([178.238.153.67]:50124 helo=[192.168.1.11]) by ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1lfqEP-0001F4-BW; Sun, 09 May 2021 21:40:53 +0100
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <634676ca-272d-d616-c352-b38446cf7aab@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <C86C30F0-2EBD-4D70-A395-E30537687C2F@gmx.de> <MN2PR19MB4045028175677183883F89E483589@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <f4056723-b4f2-8fdd-4109-df77bad3adb9@bobbriscoe.net> <f4ad1488-6723-ecaf-23b7-328c4bd09101@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
From: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>
Message-ID: <22f56260-3ab1-a3af-eb0d-08bedce133e2@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 21:40:51 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f4ad1488-6723-ecaf-23b7-328c4bd09101@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------6DF6556957E95CE7D1A98741"
Content-Language: en-GB
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: ssdrsserver2.hosting.co.uk: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/NfWlCEYCwNC9FdHsl4M46KDbPr8>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Review comments on a careful read of the L4S ID (25)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 20:41:00 -0000

Gorry,
Done
Bob

On 08/05/2021 06:29, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
> On 08/05/2021 00:25, Bob Briscoe wrote:
>>>> 25. Missing drop-only requirement for excluded traffic
>>>>   Section 5.4.1.2.  Exclusion of Traffic From L4S Treatment – this 
>>>> text:
>>>>       “The operator MUST NOT alter the end-to-end L4S ECN 
>>>> identifier from
>>>>     L4S to Classic, because its decision to exclude certain traffic 
>>>> from
>>>>     L4S treatment is local-only.”
>>>>   ⁃           I think be the word /its/this/ .
>> [BB] Possibly, but an operator is an it, and it can make decisions. 
>> 'Its' seems better to my English ear than 'this'. I'll leave it. 
>
> Ah, so I see I was mis-reading that. I see this was correct, to avoid 
> other people's mistakes, could we just replace the word by saying who 
> the phrase refers to perhaps?
>
> “The operator MUST NOT alter the end-to-end L4S ECN identifier from
>     L4S to Classic, because an operator decision to exclude certain 
> traffic from
>     L4S treatment is local-only.”
>
> Gorry
>

-- 
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe                               http://bobbriscoe.net/

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status