[tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC2883 (6355)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 22 December 2020 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC043A114D; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:22:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O_67SpeGdDR2; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:22:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0104F3A114A; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:22:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EC740F40760; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:22:35 -0800 (PST)
To: eugene.adell@gmail.com, floyd@aciri.org, mahdavi@novell.com, mathis@psc.edu, podolsky@eecs.berkeley.edu
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20201222162235.EC740F40760@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/O64_rH1amoYzwHE7qj7Hf2dHqk8>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC2883 (6355)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 16:22:54 -0000

The following errata report has been held for document update 
for RFC2883, "An Extension to the Selective Acknowledgement (SACK) Option for TCP". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6355

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Eugene Adell <eugene.adell@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2020-12-14
Held by: Martin Duke (IESG)

Section: 5.2

Original Text
-------------
   The use of D-SACK allows the sender to detect some cases (e.g., when
   no ACK packets have been lost) when a a Fast Retransmit was due to
   packet reordering instead of packet loss.  This allows the TCP sender

Corrected Text
--------------
   The use of D-SACK allows the sender to detect some cases (e.g., when
   no ACK packets have been lost) when a Fast Retransmit was due to
   packet reordering instead of packet loss.  This allows the TCP sender

Notes
-----
redundant word

--------------------------------------
RFC2883 (draft-floyd-sack-00)
--------------------------------------
Title               : An Extension to the Selective Acknowledgement (SACK) Option for TCP
Publication Date    : July 2000
Author(s)           : S. Floyd, J. Mahdavi, M. Mathis, M. Podolsky
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Transport Area Working Group
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG