IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] [iccrg] IETF104 ICCRG TCP Prague presentation

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Thu, 04 April 2019 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D911200A0 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 08:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.749
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nbbg64VpygUo for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 08:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0F79120606 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 08:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id k8so2503919lja.8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 08:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JomifhIsprqPr4+8ytbURkfsrEqwf8oUjTEMpRvh5o4=; b=vKieuN0OjbiwW2HT62wKFBNkKQggwFtz5FCtw9qAyiCAwbCWrEjCNGrAivtyGGarJn PO5wHLfr5+GlZVqgUw+GNSWqN59qfTfGt0dccI/QC6/OiqzE3RLDlgFM668ZPcmllIPu DMeQt7VEqfwJfrQ7QG3707BZAUugTlX6Hvoj9Nmv5b5xVW1ZIOG0Egc8MmYvHiSvQLZU aJ4raaLbgEV79UawRKq190DpZzIMrUW4IejcJNq01eb1DMGu69vLd1K8ogugd6hypTO7 XCLezyH2/5xMfudtNMPxS7GQNuyyJv4lLnp1V/tJBCyOv4SC3M+QLNccXHTs9NHlA3ho oPhQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JomifhIsprqPr4+8ytbURkfsrEqwf8oUjTEMpRvh5o4=; b=RqUcTKPRJ8HvZjni3mrw+XQq1X2nUWOnXQiMCQ/cR2+waJ+IHmF8IgUd8EYcAnsoBG XBKUOEO6Yirs3D3MUOY8T/kJzIKH9/wRvlRrbJIWWqOL/uwMOS8v8O7y1jAXEQpdCTFe 5Q+98EE0x1gSKMQhRhcEyAwAlVbl6PZzkL9VIi6dDe/4SWy4/Fc4iqPQ8Qa8BRX3fIyz jOM9mlZQPQEzmqNigniUPHMUbBcdoFeqdTRkHD8Cp7e+BiyZlLUB5C1Ij6qEm5Ujd99P 8g2CXPGp49u176JsknJ1Ew9f+kIRGZJLd2tmeNzFbYqCV3qoKE0ILPGOALD0MTuaxoaI xkaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUt4Swj2FgJgVUNKkVosjZ9ILXVow/cWxgAWu8F9c+N49jZsYMb y6hr5wC00zMsaaHJoEdmClo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxvFnCDmdY9TNqyArRjxhKAfYD7TBIGUIVrm4vma31ihOja4hcAOOlRxITKLqB7ddvmlraRxw==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8648:: with SMTP id i8mr3903272ljj.166.1554392600060; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 08:43:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-225-56-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.225.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s67sm3992716lja.57.2019.04.04.08.43.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Apr 2019 08:43:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <817A985F-2974-4755-B294-8CEEBFCAC744@cablelabs.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 18:43:17 +0300
Cc: Bob Briscoe <in@bobbriscoe.net>, "iccrg@irtf.org" <iccrg@irtf.org>, Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <019569E3-9D93-41B9-8D0A-D1E3501D9B3D@gmail.com>
References: <623CA1C6-3425-46E6-AFD9-6FD7D0DBE422@gmx.de> <a7bf3c8d-bb9e-e7e8-3343-ccdbac795591@bobbriscoe.net> <82B40A22-F2C2-4D56-868A-F53D7AEA37D7@gmail.com> <4507BFFD-A68A-4E8A-8FFB-347F95E3F2E8@cablelabs.com> <2491A216-4522-4942-BDEB-301D61CC5D03@gmail.com> <FD7FA874-3413-4F62-81CB-0F68B9038CC7@cablelabs.com> <B0F75E09-9264-4AC0-BF35-F084CC6213FC@gmail.com> <817A985F-2974-4755-B294-8CEEBFCAC744@cablelabs.com>
To: Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/OHtGq_sB8tLQ3pZeMGnd5lvySkA>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [iccrg] IETF104 ICCRG TCP Prague presentation
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 15:43:24 -0000

> On 4 Apr, 2019, at 6:37 pm, Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com> wrote:
> 
> My concern is that the SCE sender gets *zero* benefit from supporting SCE signaling unless the bottleneck link is an FQ link.

Our early results suggest otherwise.  However, I would like to flesh them out before further detailed discussion.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email