Re: [tsvwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-17: (with COMMENT)

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Fri, 03 April 2020 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF553A0825; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 09:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dfUHKe_K-MZQ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 09:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D4413A0821; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 09:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pDCA2lXy0NaqtL6GarGYMYS+F1Kh+4riPYozcXVwWL8=; b=RJqtfgnsbtSRM/Poy9a55eHpU Et0dPusZ0iae0bnNZhtyKD9+UFgKN6rEs5uJ10B/Njl+K2S1xpfH8fpcCnJtgGEaLwu9L3pC9Z4We GxXR0PWf6MHZPTJd0sUJF0n+QgcXR0151W18Dq+T+7N0VtKZH2seBcMu3+1NZW3bgzZveAbLvzFEA YyLEfNNS5bBfBy6E9tTbNNM1HZVdnZ5qsA4nkoZGgcxnP/Sc8AN3Aei//ZFcRvTig7Z8lweNyUltx 1WZZEA3KEVboYJgYwG7uDzL9mOAfRrXtI7bByt6ypSZZUmFp2mkRJPHl3kpFdzvrksqO28/J3hDTn R5iEOwFFA==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:54090 helo=[192.168.1.10]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1jKPeh-002C3G-EN; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 12:58:59 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_30838BC7-C51E-4D1E-9E2D-08A0FBE2F011"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.5\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwb6hDat4bUF04GPGDMPbiT=LB94vNDmJ8ejjTxUaQ9oow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 09:58:54 -0700
Cc: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org
Message-Id: <98540AD0-234D-46CB-97B0-80D4784ED86C@strayalpha.com>
References: <158567197145.28499.17719634613395272227@ietfa.amsl.com> <48d8f4fa-2478-8200-c082-1d9f46b2530d@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CAL0qLwaOOm6Btdi2wsO3TpdRxTmPaXkWy5Rn8YsoqiOOfkpd6Q@mail.gmail.com> <3f73e422-a721-0865-35dc-3b64dd153d9f@erg.abdn.ac.uk> <CAL0qLwb6hDat4bUF04GPGDMPbiT=LB94vNDmJ8ejjTxUaQ9oow@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.5)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/OUXeI9QmxYUG7yxwiMkvg_pvDdg>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-17: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 16:59:02 -0000

Hi, all,

I’m not sure I understand the change - are the requirements of this system “on the implementer of PLPMUTD” or “on systems on which PLPMTUD operates”.

The shift of text below seems to include the latter, but that seems odd to me…

Joe

> On Apr 3, 2020, at 5:36 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:10 AM Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk <mailto:gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>> wrote:
> Would this work:
> 
> OLD:
> 
> Probe packets: On request, a DPLPMTUD sender is REQUIRED to be
>         able to transmit a packet larger than the PLMPMTU.
>         This is used to send a probe packet.  ...
> NEW:
> 
> Probe packets: The network interface below PL is REQUIRED to provide
>         a way to transmit a probe packet that is larger than the PLMPMTU. .... 
> 
> Yes, that's much better..  Thanks!
> 
> -MSK