[tsvwg] planning to close L4S issue #21
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Thu, 04 June 2020 20:25 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06703A0F31 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j7jdoLqE5fit for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x735.google.com (mail-qk1-x735.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::735]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17E5C3A0F30 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x735.google.com with SMTP id c12so7510086qkk.13 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 13:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=rtdvRsDbVAj2W70IC1gWq6oBVZWowErA0cdvGAjyzNk=; b=WSUKCNMOGuhp7TkIy18XfBA4l435GiMsGkQCeiOZVsWhrQdB9sEPtNJV8+5/TfRFdh +NECuhxB7GgasdpLQ9yKsNp0s8oh/FkL88w9ylJUY1nPwFQD1/+HLoH5egA0BgjAb1x5 h54Y1AegZSuFOwa55uggUwcKp1VbRKp1fJDKClhi+bvddtVFQ7kNpnNRD1yBntj4AFRY SLgPnjayjOWvI7rCz+N5YVO/GNmSey95J2aIJcyhZr1tcce1CNBUpnx+jQ8CETGcvEWr L2/QxnIjHtA1Cc3VUIwOGckt0UR2TsqCFkHe4IwBB6oN6aFaDK7in08sBumLFmCOs9Fb oSwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=rtdvRsDbVAj2W70IC1gWq6oBVZWowErA0cdvGAjyzNk=; b=gugOatnvn6TtH4r54J7OPYLAXRsdCZkvPvTJPx8EZuh8Rr6+O15+PpKONe+iB+HI/5 NrUjauEL9Co6VJ0RWGah/+VM9oTQGnDq6++h2gY5IqlT5MxVUS1GZv8Ck2U2fRJlgB3p GwfQ2++TWPi3Mg4wvEMXZCkGNnfe3+VtiBFbMNeGqt4B7hq69HcOOeVymAtLwCyqVfM+ 4FRgHokVd0KBSiyAbjpPOM6jVERCDWbGExRkZHURG2dDzEKaRG9cQjADHaNz3hzZRF5l NZTIYTJX8L3YAnmUvUeopfaEzJMuVASD1pcFgh/MFGZuAhCGtASMf2PKtFmj4ZxrOC7g wMdA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZICk1ejA2RcsTN/+/51RpWcsHqw6M2+XZdp7Kd/b+sVOckN4A mKa0Q+UdvlZnTeIhcHbGvMXUd0Fi4scvXA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfnjQsm14R4mm3lFuJASAROI/d3kLrdSvW8e5I960NUk/49W8UghtItfOxh7oC09hDaRgG1w==
X-Received: by 2002:ae9:de85:: with SMTP id s127mr6951805qkf.352.1591302326941; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 13:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.12] (user-12l31c7.cable.mindspring.com. [69.81.133.135]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w26sm5378844qtt.86.2020.06.04.13.25.26 for <tsvwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jun 2020 13:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Message-ID: <fe102e16-549a-0296-5ddb-c5ac532a8c60@mti-systems.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:25:22 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/OW7IDC9x_ZyOJgh0EuZtWt3omVc>
Subject: [tsvwg] planning to close L4S issue #21
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 20:25:30 -0000
I think that issue #16 and #17 (which are on L4S interactions with 3168
ECN and FQ AQMs) are more specific and cover the same concern as issue
#21 ("CE codepoint semantics").
I am planning to close issue #21 as a duplicate, but wanted to run this
by the WG first to make sure I haven't missed something.
- [tsvwg] planning to close L4S issue #21 Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] planning to close L4S issue #21 Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: [tsvwg] planning to close L4S issue #21 Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] planning to close L4S issue #21 Jonathan Morton
- Re: [tsvwg] planning to close L4S issue #21 Ingemar Johansson S
- Re: [tsvwg] planning to close L4S issue #21 Rodney W. Grimes