Re: [tsvwg] charter questions (was Re: Dual-Q Polcing)

[Gorry Fairhurst <[e-mail]>]

See below.


On 28/05/2020 00:52, Tom Henderson wrote:
> On 5/27/20 7:41 AM, Gorry Fairhurst wrote:
>>
> (snip)
>
>>
>> The WG Chairs and ADs have been discussing what topics should best be 
>> included in which documents. My own suggestion would be to allow a 
>> few weeks for the document editors to digest this and then propose 
>> what needs to be done in the next steps to take this forward.
>>
>
> Gorry,
> As part of this process, will the charter be updated to include 
> working on low-latency service using ECT(1) as an input, or the L4S 
> experiment specifically?
>
Our current charter has milestones relating to ECN propagation in 
tunnels and to development of L4S, these will be developed by the 
working group.
> Also, regarding guidance to operators who do not participate in 
> experiments, will the WG work on a recommendation for default router 
> handling of ECT(1), outside of the L4S drafts?
>
> - Tom

I'd hope that the WG will focus on developing the L4S specs - at least 
for the next series of meeting cycles. That work will include guidance 
on how ECN codepoints should be used and how equipment should be configured.

Gorry