[tsvwg] L4S performance results
Bob Briscoe <research@bobbriscoe.net> Fri, 26 July 2019 15:40 UTC
Return-Path: <research@bobbriscoe.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5301B120164 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bobbriscoe.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6VGH29rYCCl for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server.dnsblock1.com (server.dnsblock1.com [85.13.236.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4FAD120161 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bobbriscoe.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wmHQD6sQyMdppQn4mSbnd+grSv0YzgNSd+ilBWvInQ4=; b=FVpkLo01dWfrH1yEY9UPlGSBqh ZTGYCri/RVfjX/k8ydM7EktLBFG0yxxDwFTgkCvWkt+6u1jLemQGoNa79jz9tAr7JDtF+atkugtSP LA9Kz8PfHf9f5+GNE6fXqdv8634EXkFCWk92T1PPKSnmdyDT35p2ymCKX8eVJyhIX/F7GEHGE69n6 BMikdiuP8UntKgjX/FiLCj5z/g0IBXr0PGRZaMTsxGlMJb87xQ/MzDEXWTI1FKvUweVi42fov/mCy JIAGu6/mtlJx2r5e0qNB5UHUf3gDR7IP9AfpG4bnCzmRDQV7cAyY0V61aLzsk1quF4hxidZma33gU N1KBlfpQ==;
Received: from dhcp-819f.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.129.159]:49574) by server.dnsblock1.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <research@bobbriscoe.net>) id 1hr2KF-0004an-Lj for tsvwg@ietf.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2019 16:40:07 +0100
To: tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
From: Bob Briscoe <research@bobbriscoe.net>
Message-ID: <294afbe9-451d-7bc8-8e07-fd01ec7a6f81@bobbriscoe.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 11:40:06 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------BE2477F4245CB6D0869BBF2C"
Content-Language: en-GB
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server.dnsblock1.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bobbriscoe.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server.dnsblock1.com: authenticated_id: in@bobbriscoe.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: server.dnsblock1.com: in@bobbriscoe.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/P6hHfLD_Ghv66xdJB0fJ4glWkso>
Subject: [tsvwg] L4S performance results
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 15:40:13 -0000
tsvwg, Since it's been a long time since we posted the original L4S performance results, we have uploaded the full set of experiments we generally do as a regression test. The performance in all tests is still broadly the same as it has been since 2015. Data Centre to the Home’:Deployable Ultra-Low Queuing Delay for All <http://bobbriscoe.net/projects/latency/dctth_journal_draft20190726.pdf> In order to explain the experimental scenarios for those on this list, we have stuck the full results on the end of a draft paper we are submitting to a journal. The journal paper only included a selection of the results (to fit the page limit), but we have appended all the results at the end, in the format we have developed to summarize everything in a tight space. Regards Bob, Koen, Olga, Olivier -- ________________________________________________________________ Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/
- [tsvwg] L4S performance results Bob Briscoe