Re: Comments regarding draft-nishida-tsvwg-sctp-failover-03.txt

[Michael Tüxen <[e-mail]>]

On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Yoshifumi Nishida wrote:

> Hi Michael,
> 
> Thank you so much for the review.  Most points were addressed by Preethi.
> So, I just would like to clarify one point.
> 
> 2011/8/22 Michael Tüxen <[e-mail]>:
> 
>> 
>>   o  When the sender receives an heartbeat ACK from a PF destination,
>>      the sender clears the destination's error counter and transitions
>>      the PF destination back to active state.  This state transition
>>      MUST NOT be notified to the ULP unless it is explicitly requested.
>>      This destination's cwnd is set to 1 MTU (TODO: or 2?  Needs more
>>      text discussing rationale; can revisit later?)
>> 
>> We don't have defined a notification. I don't see the value
>> of it. So maybe you want to get rid of it?
> 
> Hmm. I might miss your point, but I believe we cannot use arbitrary value..
> Shall we refer 7.2.1 in RFC4960?
I was not clear... I'm referring to the sentence:

This state transition MUST NOT be notified to the ULP unless it
is explicitly requested.

Currently we do not have such a notification. That is why I'm asking,
if it would be better to remove it.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> --
> Yoshifumi Nishida
> [e-mail]
>