IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] AD Evaluation comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-07

"Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com> Sat, 23 September 2017 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <David.Black@dell.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE60F1286C7; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 11:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dell.com header.b=XjHMrqjJ; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=emc.com header.b=SDiHYsia
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QftZxhudgFnN; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 11:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esa6.dell-outbound.iphmx.com (esa6.dell-outbound.iphmx.com [68.232.149.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2411713295C; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 11:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dell.com; i=@dell.com; q=dns/txt; s=smtpout; t=1506190137; x=1537726137; h=from:cc:to:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=9oh23G2QUoRTR2QQT1L+Yl+0v03H4buPunqLfMDHeus=; b=XjHMrqjJSV3sRz/DzW+0LvM7y1BdlzsSwdYjt6z/nkmv0D5++ZXEp2w2 8cwpz7NoUIKCVJqf9CQZqnyDXV+I6Ut8DaE1+S6l+hOy48pV/qwOCvnP3 fkUtQ8Z+IyrnGHtbhTTkNPbt6CRC4HwD2Uv5OU+mrZTOnK9bGBFAnCJK9 s=;
Received: from esa6.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.99]) by esa6.dell-outbound.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Sep 2017 13:08:56 -0500
From: "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11@ietf.org>, "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>
Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com ([168.159.213.141]) by esa6.dell-outbound2.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Sep 2017 00:08:56 +0600
Received: from maildlpprd06.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd06.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.38]) by mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id v8NI8riH001294 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 23 Sep 2017 14:08:55 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com v8NI8riH001294
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1506190135; bh=cqLL4bjTF2exqxAMCtXy0gjUSQk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=SDiHYsiavFIfCww5Xi4lgw9r23xpMjRohFY27fC+It5LsWsTV3nJrWKIjjiuaihJk XXtHIopbJJuXgoaY7NdXD8xrg3UAjyrNhtPUXUrOaChXI3o8MvxPrm/J3n71/dpfEy QmLjnVhhrig9HYTHiSdFkS/EY8CjBnyBeV0WnEeA=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com v8NI8riH001294
Received: from mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.19]) by maildlpprd06.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Sat, 23 Sep 2017 14:08:37 -0400
Received: from MXHUB310.corp.emc.com (MXHUB310.corp.emc.com [10.146.3.36]) by mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id v8NI8bEh011460 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 23 Sep 2017 14:08:37 -0400
Received: from MX307CL04.corp.emc.com ([fe80::849f:5da2:11b:4385]) by MXHUB310.corp.emc.com ([10.146.3.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0352.000; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 14:08:37 -0400
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, "Tim Szigeti (szigeti)" <szigeti@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: AD Evaluation comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-07
Thread-Index: AQHTLDvXSq+UxrknR0ODuGgkGJv9zaK298IAgAP1DQCAAIaqAIAAc+wAgAE1a4CABbhwkA==
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 18:08:36 +0000
Message-ID: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362FC6A341@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com>
References: <CAKKJt-dnnYxO0C9ahXURu8aDjpRP=vtKn8z2JsiRm+YP+mLrVw@mail.gmail.com> <b0d50d3b2488488b8ef4f621a776eed5@XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362FC59749@MX307CL04.corp.emc.com> <CAKKJt-fLm0kT6LR7fqX4RvyOBeU6NsXqJOKzih=6Y76fqvhdDw@mail.gmail.com> <dc3d512a82ba44a39e286fdfbafbbf83@XCH-RCD-010.cisco.com> <CAKKJt-eif=FVGu7W_y79nKvwMx0Cw-4nEsqtEog=vmKL7A5+jg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-eif=FVGu7W_y79nKvwMx0Cw-4nEsqtEog=vmKL7A5+jg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.102.147]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362FC6A341MX307CL04corpem_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd01.lss.emc.com
X-RSA-Classifications: public
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/R20oKJhXwGBp6DE5o1JwTwBDTSE>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] AD Evaluation comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-07
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 18:08:59 -0000

> Ready for me to pull the trigger?

Yes, please do, Thanks, --David

From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF [mailto:spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 6:46 PM
To: Tim Szigeti (szigeti) <szigeti@cisco.com>
Cc: Black, David <david.black@emc.com>; tsvwg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11@ietf.org
Subject: Re: AD Evaluation comments for draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11-07

Dear David the Document Shepherd,

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Tim Szigeti (szigeti) <szigeti@cisco.com<mailto:szigeti@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi Spencer,

I made the minor change requested; now the sentence avoids the loaded term ‘should consider’.

Suffice it to say that the security of the devices and networks implementing QoS, including QoS mapping between wired and wireless networks, merits consideration in actual deployments.

(Thanks David for bringing this to our attention).

With that done, I think we’re ready for Last Call.


Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email