Re: [tsvwg] L4S vs SCE

["Scheffenegger, Richard" <[e-mail]>]

Just to give another example, but with more manageable scope:

Remember that both DCTCP and DCQCN (RoCEv2 as spec'ed by the IBTA)
effectively use parts of the L4S framework already in their enclaves.

Isolating such domains where L4S is found to be useful even after an
internet-wide experiment fails is obviously also a realistic option.

Richard

Am 20.11.2019 um 11:49 schrieb Ingemar Johansson S:
> Hi
>
> So given the imagined outcome that L4S fails.. two scenarios
>
> If other SDOs or developers don’t pick up L4S then things are quite
> simple I guess, just declare the L4S drafts as deprecated, or is there
> more to do ?
>
> But, if e.g. 3GPP somehow thinks that this is a good idea and adopts
> it.. Will the IETF send a message (LS?) to 3GPP with the message “please
> stop using L4S”, is this even a reasonable scenario?. After all, the
> fact that it is picked up by other SDOs, speaks against a failure ?
>
> /Ingemar