Re: [tsvwg] WGLC Announcement for draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-02: 19th March 2013

[Yoshifumi Nishida <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

I support this draft.
Some minor questions I have are related to the following rule in the draft.
"the sending of a DATA chunk fills the congestion or receiver window."

1: I am personally curious about how much benefit we can get by this.
    If there's an analysis on this, I will want to see it in the reference.

2: Because this rule will be checked on every packet transmission, I
would like to know if the draft suggests to set I-bit everytime we
have a chance or there might be a case where we shouldn't.

Thanks,
--
Yoshifumi


On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Gorry Fairhurst <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> This email announces the start of a working group last call for
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately-02.txt, "SACK-IMMEDIATELY Extension
> for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol". This document is now thought
> to be ready to proceed to be published as a PS. Please send any comments to
> the TSVWG list.
>
> The draft is available at:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-sack-immediately/
>
> The last call will run for TWO weeks, ending Friday 5th April 2013.
>
> Emails saying "I support" or "I don't support" publication are also most
> helpful in judging the WG consensus. Please let us know if this draft is
> useful and seems to provide the correct advice.
>
> James, David and Gorry
> (TSVWG Chairs)
> [e-mail]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>