Re: [saag] Fwd: fyi: tcpcrypt draft
Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Wed, 27 July 2011 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3C25E8002; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.950, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_MARKET=2.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FXmVQb6QTQS2; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu (darkstar.isi.edu [128.9.128.127]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5628C5E8001; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 15:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by darkstar.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6RLxd24000317 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E308A4B.4090702@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 14:59:39 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Handley <M.Handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [saag] Fwd: fyi: tcpcrypt draft
References: <4DC6C56D.6040709@ieca.com> <D1CCED3D-C041-4DA2-B999-D3EF7FC889D0@cisco.com> <20110727184256.GA3690@shorty> <CADRHXGuS3G=UWVxZzuQ80kHEydrcMZKJ4hG23Sm8h7A3LPvULQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADRHXGuS3G=UWVxZzuQ80kHEydrcMZKJ4hG23Sm8h7A3LPvULQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: saag@ietf.org, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:00:26 -0000
Hi, Mark (et al.), I'm cc-ing this to the TSVWG mailing list for the benefit of those attending TSVAREA, where the presentation will occur tomorrow AM. Since this is the second IETF transport presentation (the first was in TCPM at IETF 80), I hope this presentation will clarify how the current tcpcrypt code uses the existing TCP option space. In specific, it appears to use *two* unassigned TCP option codepoints (69 and 70), rather than experimental codepoints (and, IMO, it should use the latter instead). I hope the presentation this time will address the plans to correct the currently deployed code to appropriately use the experimental codepoints. Joe
- Re: [saag] Fwd: fyi: tcpcrypt draft Joe Touch
- Re: [saag] Fwd: fyi: tcpcrypt draft Mark Handley
- Re: [saag] Fwd: fyi: tcpcrypt draft Joe Touch
- RE: [saag] Fwd: fyi: tcpcrypt draft Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)
- Re: [saag] Fwd: fyi: tcpcrypt draft Joe Touch